Return to Video

Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed

  • 0:43 - 0:48
    [applause]
  • 0:59 - 1:01
    It's a joy to be here with all of you.
  • 1:03 - 1:07
    To all the organizations that have put this event together
  • 1:07 - 1:10
    and made it possible for me to be here,
  • 1:12 - 1:13
    I'd like to say thank you.
  • 1:13 - 1:18
    And to the wonderful world of the seed,
  • 1:18 - 1:20
    I'd like to say thank you,
  • 1:20 - 1:22
    because, you know, I started out life thinking
  • 1:23 - 1:28
    the quanta was going to be my companion for life,
  • 1:28 - 1:34
    and I had to abandon that passionate love affair
  • 1:34 - 1:37
    with physics and quantam physics in particular
  • 1:37 - 1:42
    for a love affair with the seed.
  • 1:42 - 1:45
    Partly because the threat to the seed
  • 1:45 - 1:53
    made me realize how vital it was to continuity of life.
  • 1:53 - 2:01
    The word for seed in Hindi and Sanskrit is बीज.
  • 2:01 - 2:06
    ज means life, and बीज means that in which life
  • 2:06 - 2:14
    resides to arise on its own again and again and again.
  • 2:14 - 2:17
    And when we start a season,
  • 2:17 - 2:21
    lots of seed festivals with every cultivation season,
  • 2:21 - 2:26
    and we do because of our tropical climate have many more cultivation seasons.
  • 2:26 - 2:31
    Some places we have four seasons of cultivation,
  • 2:31 - 2:34
    especially in the area of for example Bengal;
  • 2:34 - 2:40
    in some places we have three, but most places we have two.
  • 2:40 - 2:46
    And before you sow the seed, there's a prayer:
  • 2:46 - 2:51
    "let the seed be exhaustless".
  • 2:51 - 2:53
    Let life never run out.
  • 2:53 - 2:55
    And the stories from around the world,
  • 2:55 - 2:57
    stories from my region,
  • 2:57 - 3:00
    I come from the Himalayan belt, um,
  • 3:00 - 3:02
    where during a war and a famine
  • 3:04 - 3:08
    people died of starvation.
  • 3:08 - 3:14
    But the seed which used to be kept in empty squash containers, which we call _
  • 3:14 - 3:19
    not one seed had been eaten.
  • 3:19 - 3:22
    Because every culture recognized
  • 3:22 - 3:25
    you cannot eat seed corn.
  • 3:25 - 3:26
    You've got to save it for the future.
  • 3:26 - 3:32
    Your life doesn't matter, but life in general does matter.
  • 3:32 - 3:44
    And it's that wisdom of the seed to renew, to multiply, to be shared, to be spread,
  • 3:44 - 3:48
    that has suddenly been seen as a problem
  • 3:48 - 3:56
    for those who would make money out of killing the seed.
  • 3:56 - 4:04
    Killing the essential nature of the seed as a reproductive renewable resource.
  • 4:04 - 4:07
    And every attempt has been made in the last two decades
  • 4:07 - 4:11
    to turn seed into a non-renewable resource.
  • 4:11 - 4:18
    Out of it, something that in its own nature creates abundance, you know?
  • 4:18 - 4:22
    Every tiny seed, I get fascinated with seeds of amaranth for example,
  • 4:22 - 4:26
    You know how tiny that little seed of amaranth is?
  • 4:26 - 4:29
    And at least in our Himalaya you get, ah!
  • 4:29 - 4:35
    You can't even begin to count the number of seed one seed of amaranth can give rise to.
  • 4:35 - 4:40
    All the millets, or even the rices and the wheats and the barleys,
  • 4:40 - 4:42
    one gives rise to many.
  • 4:42 - 4:44
    That's a problem.
  • 4:44 - 4:46
    One should give rise to nothing,
  • 4:46 - 4:49
    then you make the profits.
  • 4:49 - 4:53
    And during the 80's I was very involved in some of these discussions.
  • 4:54 - 4:57
    They used to be in the FAO at that time,
  • 4:57 - 5:03
    the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
  • 5:03 - 5:07
    a term used called "seed wars".
  • 5:07 - 5:13
    The chemical industry that had moved into the seed sector,
  • 5:13 - 5:20
    um, had started to say it's not fair that farmers save seed. It's not equitable that they save seed,
  • 5:20 - 5:27
    equity is monopoly, only the corporations should have the right to seed.
  • 5:27 - 5:29
    And they spent a lot of time, couldn't get their way
  • 5:29 - 5:36
    because in the United Nations you have one vote for one country,
  • 5:36 - 5:39
    and the majority of the countries happen to be third world countries,
  • 5:39 - 5:44
    they happen to be countries which have given seed and biodivensity to the world,
  • 5:44 - 5:51
    and they did not like the idea of seed being reduced to private property.
  • 5:51 - 5:57
    So the corporations then moved to a new institution that was being created
  • 5:57 - 6:05
    through what was then a half institution called the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
  • 6:05 - 6:15
    And it's fascinating that for 30 years the industry had drafted laws for all kinds of monopoly,
  • 6:15 - 6:21
    monopoly in entertainment, if a Mickey Mouse turns up anywhere, even in a child's notebook,
  • 6:21 - 6:22
    they should pay royalty.
  • 6:22 - 6:24
    Or a t-shirt.
  • 6:24 - 6:33
    And then, by then, a company that had only been related to warfare, to agent orange,
  • 6:33 - 6:36
    very rapidly moved into the biotechnology sector,
  • 6:36 - 6:43
    very rapidly started to buy up both venture capital firms as well as seed companies.
  • 6:43 - 6:50
    And Monsanto emerged as the biggest seed monopoly in the world
  • 6:50 - 6:57
    in the drafting of what is today called the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement
  • 6:57 - 6:58
    what a mouthful.
  • 6:58 - 7:00
    Precisely because this is not trade related
  • 7:00 - 7:02
    and seed is not intellectual property,
  • 7:02 - 7:04
    it doesn't pop out of anyone's head.
  • 7:04 - 7:11
    Intellectual property is defined as property in products of the mind.
  • 7:11 - 7:16
    Here is a very material biological system
  • 7:16 - 7:19
    thst is suddenly redefined as intellectual property.
  • 7:19 - 23:19
    And, uh, a whole agreement was shaped around it
  • Not Synced
    and TR was put there because India, my country, refused to accept patent law as a trade issue.
  • Not Synced
    They said no, this is about nations deciding how far monopolies will go.
  • Not Synced
    Nations deciding the balance between the public and the private.
  • Not Synced
    And we had worked out a patent law over 20 years of democratic debate in society
  • Not Synced
    to get rid of the British laws that had been exactly like what we are coming back to.
  • Not Synced
    Total monopoly in a few companies' hands.
  • Not Synced
    So the lawyers of course, vary clever,
  • Not Synced
    put TR before IP and said now it's Trade Related by definition,
  • Not Synced
    so now you will accept it.
  • Not Synced
    After the WTO came into force,
  • Not Synced
    a representative of Monsanto actually said this.
  • Not Synced
    he said that what we've achieved in this agreement is something unprecedented:
  • Not Synced
    we defined a problem, and in this case the problem was farmers saving seeds.
  • Not Synced
    That was a problem.
  • Not Synced
    And we defined solution: make it illegal for farmers to save seeds.
  • Not Synced
    And we created the instrument, which is the TRIPS Agreement,
  • Not Synced
    which forces every country now to have laws of monopoly.
  • Not Synced
    And we created the institution that would ensure that these are implemented;
  • Not Synced
    the institution, WTO is an interesting institution
  • Not Synced
    because it's the international court,
  • Not Synced
    it's an international non-parliament, non-democratic;
  • Not Synced
    and it is the international executive, yeah?
  • Not Synced
    As Monsanto's representative said,
  • Not Synced
    in shaping this treaty we were the patient, the diagnostician, and the physician all in one.
  • Not Synced
    For me, that's a description of dictatorship.
  • Not Synced
    If you define the problem, you find the solution, you become the judge and the executive,
  • Not Synced
    where is democracy?
  • Not Synced
    And around seed, which is the most democratic experience on the planet
  • Not Synced
    that spreads abundance.
  • Not Synced
    The seed is as much part of the relationship of the bee and the butterfly,
  • Not Synced
    as it is with the soil organisms that it ultimately sustains,
  • Not Synced
    as it is with the food, the breakfast you're eating.
  • Not Synced
    All these relationships are in the seed.
  • Not Synced
    In 1992 was I think the first time US companies started to enter India.
  • Not Synced
    '91 was when the whole new idea of globalization started to be spread
  • Not Synced
    initially through the World Bank,
  • Not Synced
    and '95 onwards for the World Trade Organization.
  • Not Synced
    And I remember in '92 Cargill, which still owned its own seed supply,
  • Not Synced
    now it's owned by Monsanto,
  • Not Synced
    I don't know how many of you realize
  • Not Synced
    that outside the US Cargill Seeds is now Monsanto.
  • Not Synced
    At that time Cargill was still Cargill,
  • Not Synced
    and they'd brought in hybrid sunflower seeds which failed miserably.
  • Not Synced
    I had been working with the farmers in India and the farmers' organizations,
  • Not Synced
    and I had been telling them about these corporations.
  • Not Synced
    At that time of course Cargill was and still is the biggest grain trader.
  • Not Synced
    And while doing workshops on the Uruguay round and the WTO and the GATT,
  • Not Synced
    I used to tell them about the companies.
  • Not Synced
    The farmers of , as a result of the failure of the sunflower
  • Not Synced
    marched up to the Cargill...
  • Not Synced
    uh...
  • Not Synced
    it shouldn't be called a seed production unit,
  • Not Synced
    because seeds are produced in the field and in farms,
  • Not Synced
    and the seed utilities ad facilities are really only packaging units.
  • Not Synced
    All they do is put a seal on it.
  • Not Synced
    And again, you might not even remember,
  • Not Synced
    they used to, you used to have a trade representative whose name was Carla Hills.
  • Not Synced
    And Carla Hills had visited India in 1988
  • Not Synced
    saying crowbar by crowbar we are going to open your economy to our companies.
  • Not Synced
    This was around the time, you know, we'd had Bhopal in '84,
  • Not Synced
    Dupont was sending an old nylon plant and we were saying sorry we don't want it,
  • Not Synced
    And Carla Hill saying no you have it, your market is our market.
  • Not Synced
    And she talked about this crowbar by crowbar and I talked to my farmer friends about it.
  • Not Synced
    So they went, literally with crowbars
  • Not Synced
    and pulled down this whole large prison-like utility,
  • Not Synced
    and razed it to the ground and said
  • Not Synced
    crowbar by crowbar we're gonna send these companies back to you.
  • Not Synced
    [applause from the audience]
  • Not Synced
    That's only part of the story.
  • Not Synced
    The real story is at the end of it,
  • Not Synced
    the Cargill head for Asia Pacific flies into India,
  • Not Synced
    holds a press conference,
  • Not Synced
    and says how stupid Indian farmers are
  • Not Synced
    because they don't realize Cargill with its intelligence is creating seeds
  • Not Synced
    which prevent the bees from usurping the pollen.
  • Not Synced
    This wonderful act of creating fertility through pollenation
  • Not Synced
    is now redefined as theft in a mindset where life should be owned as a monopoly.
  • Not Synced
    No plant should grown without permission from the companies,
  • Not Synced
    no seed should renew without permission of the company,
  • Not Synced
    and of course no farmer should ever regrow a crop without paying a royalty.
  • Not Synced
    In the negociations on the convention on biological diversity
  • Not Synced
    a twin statement was made about about Roundup resistance.
  • Not Synced
    We were basically saying we don't need negative traits
  • Not Synced
    like making crops more resistant intolerant to herbicides,
  • Not Synced
    we need to phase out herbicides rather than spray more of them.
  • Not Synced
    And if pesticides were bad, we definitely don't need pesticide plants,
  • Not Synced
    plants which produce theire own pesticide
  • Not Synced
    by introducing genes for toxins into it like the [---beety---] crops.
  • Not Synced
    And in the case of Roundup,
  • Not Synced
    again I remember,
  • Not Synced
    in the negotiations on the convention on biological diversity that the Monsanto representative -
  • Not Synced
    I think it was the vice president, the chair, or --
  • Not Synced
    and he says "we are now breeding crops that prevent weeds from stealing the sunshine".
  • Not Synced
    Now, what is called weeds is really the biodiversity of diverse fields,
  • Not Synced
    and the best sustainable agriculture, the best organic farming,
  • Not Synced
    has to be rotational and mixtures.
  • Not Synced
    The minute you have a monoculture I disqualify it as organic.
  • Not Synced
    Organic means letting nature do the essential work of renewal,
  • Not Synced
    of soil fertility [applause], moisture conservation,
  • Not Synced
    and if you let nature do the work, nature needs companions,
  • Not Synced
    it needs partners,
  • Not Synced
    it needs helpers,
  • Not Synced
    and only diversity offers the help,
  • Not Synced
    and the substitutes for the poisons that have entered farming.
  • Not Synced
    Only nature.
  • Not Synced
    The nitrogen fixing that nature can do,
  • Not Synced
    if we do the right mixing.
  • Not Synced
    The wonderful botanicals that are available for pest control.
  • Not Synced
    I fought for 11 years a case on the piracy of
  • Not Synced
    a wonderful tree that we have used for pest control
  • Not Synced
    for as long as I remember.
  • Not Synced
    I remember when I first saw the patent on neem,
  • Not Synced
    and it was said this was an invention of the pesticide use.
  • Not Synced
    And I said my mother and grandmother were using neem to store grain, to store clothes,
  • Not Synced
    farmers of India have constantly used neem,
  • Not Synced
    and when the terrible disaster of Bhopal took place in '84,
  • Not Synced
    I remember I went to Bhopal and the, you know, the at the station were laughing at me
  • Not Synced
    because I was carrying these sapplings of neem.
  • Not Synced
    They said "why are you carrying this?"
  • Not Synced
    And I told them about the disaster and said we are starting a campaign
  • Not Synced
    "No More Bhopals, Plant A Neem",
  • Not Synced
    and then 10 years later find neem has been patented.
  • Not Synced
    For that 11 years.
  • Not Synced
    But this is just one of thousands in every part of the world
  • Not Synced
    has its own way of controlling weeds,
  • Not Synced
    of controlling pests,
  • Not Synced
    of doing everything that toxic chemicals have been introduced into farming for.
  • Not Synced
    I think the big problem with how seed has moved
  • Not Synced
    from being the ultimate source of renewal of life,
  • Not Synced
    to becoming the ultimate non-renewable resource patented and owned,
  • Not Synced
    uh, by a handful of companies,
  • Not Synced
    now it's reduced to 5, very rapidly reduced to 5,
  • Not Synced
    in this decade.
  • Not Synced
    So fast that you can't even count,
  • Not Synced
    you can't even keep up with the counting.
  • Not Synced
    Partly because for us this has all happened in a very short period,
  • Not Synced
    you know, for you it happened over a hundred years,
  • Not Synced
    and so the generations that have passed
  • Not Synced
    who saw the first disappearance of the open seed,
  • Not Synced
    the free seed,
  • Not Synced
    we started to see the problem with the green revolution
  • Not Synced
    introduced in 1965/68, 6 in India,
  • Not Synced
    and the green revolution was basically the introduction of chemical industrial farming
  • Not Synced
    in peasant economy,
  • Not Synced
    where the average landholdings are less than a hectare,
  • Not Synced
    80% land holding are less than a hectare,
  • Not Synced
    70% of India, over 1.2 billion population, lives on the land, yah?
  • Not Synced
    So you can imagine how tiny our farms are.
  • Not Synced
    And on this land was introduced the chemicals.
  • Not Synced
    Why did the green revolution have to wait til 1965/66?
  • Not Synced
    They were trying from the end of the war.
  • Not Synced
    All those war chemicals including the nitrogen from explosives factories,
  • Not Synced
    all the pesticides,
  • Not Synced
    they needed to find a market.
  • Not Synced
    But the indigenous seeds
  • Not Synced
    practiced non-cooperation with chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    they just _, no, don't want you.
  • Not Synced
    Sot he problem was the seed had to be redesigned to adapt to chemicals.
  • Not Synced
    The promotion, propaganda by the green revolution was "feeding the hungry".
  • Not Synced
    No, it was just spreading chemicals and poisons around the world.
  • Not Synced
    And the redesigning was done by the dwarfing technique, you know?
  • Not Synced
    Taking genes from the dwarf varieties,
  • Not Synced
    in the case of rice from an Indonesian variety,
  • Not Synced
    in the case of wheat from a Japanese variety collected during the war, norin.
  • Not Synced
    And these dwarf varieties then, could take a lot of chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    but they required a lot of water.
  • Not Synced
    Interestingly, the dwarfing was making the plant produce less biological matter.
  • Not Synced
    And the useful biological matter for the soil, for the animals, had just disappeared overnight.
  • Not Synced
    The straw was now seen as waste,
  • Not Synced
    but the straw is what feeds the cattle,
  • Not Synced
    the straw is what goes back into your compost,
  • Not Synced
    the straw is what makes organic.
  • Not Synced
    So this one change to adapt the seed to chemical
  • Not Synced
    meant the disappearance of fodder for livestock,
  • Not Synced
    therefore the disappearance of animals,
  • Not Synced
    therefore the entry of tractors into a poor country.
  • Not Synced
    And I go around the country and find some of the highest debt is for the tractors
  • Not Synced
    that were bought 20 years, 30 years ago,
  • Not Synced
    today, the farmers are having to pay the bills and they can't afford to.
  • Not Synced
    And the cattle have disappeared.
  • Not Synced
    Because truly sustainable agriculture is agriculture not just with diversity of crops,
  • Not Synced
    but with an integration with livestock,
  • Not Synced
    and an integration with perennials and trees,
  • Not Synced
    then you have the perfect organic farm,
  • Not Synced
    then nature has a way to recycle the biological systems to perfection.
  • Not Synced
    And as [Albert] Howard said, writing about Indian farms in 1905 when he came to India,
  • Not Synced
    and in his wonderful book The Agricultural Testament Howard said
  • Not Synced
    "The farms here are as permanent as the forest and the prairie
  • Not Synced
    because they work on those principles of nature".
  • Not Synced
    And that's another reason why I feel there has to be a much more intimate ineraction
  • Not Synced
    between the ecology movement and the organic movement,
  • Not Synced
    because some ecologists still think that the day farming began, nature was assaulted.[?]
  • Not Synced
    No, you can work with nature in non-violent ways to produce for human needs
  • Not Synced
    while keeping space, leaving adequate ecological space for other species.
  • Not Synced
    And even more importantly, a lesson we have learned,
  • Not Synced
    the more space you leave for other beings,
  • Not Synced
    the more food you get for human beings.
  • Not Synced
    [applause]
  • Not Synced
    Totally counter-intuitive .
  • Not Synced
    Of course the more has to be counted in diversity.
  • Not Synced
    And I have talked about the mono culture of the mind,
  • Not Synced
    which excludes diversity,
  • Not Synced
    focuses on a single commodity,
  • Not Synced
    and on the yield of one part of a plant for that commodity production,
  • Not Synced
    shrinks the farms biological capacity,
  • Not Synced
    and talks about increasing production.
  • Not Synced
    And that's because the monoculture of the mind
  • Not Synced
    has left the biodiversity out.
  • Not Synced
    I really think we need to shift from measuring yields to measuring output,
  • Not Synced
    and we need to... yields refer to an individual commodity production,
  • Not Synced
    and yields refer to what leaves the farm;
  • Not Synced
    output refers to what the farm produces
  • Not Synced
    including what will be used as an internal input on the farm itself.
  • Not Synced
    Something that's just not calculated.
  • Not Synced
    All the compost we grow,
  • Not Synced
    the seeds we grow out,
  • Not Synced
    they're never counted as part of what the farm is producing.
  • Not Synced
    Well this green revolution
  • Not Synced
    ... was destroyed within 10 years of chemical agriculture.
  • Not Synced
    There seems to be a habit
  • Not Synced
    of, you know, if things go wrong and things are non-sustainable, just do more of it faster.
  • Not Synced
    And that's what biotech has become,
  • Not Synced
    it's called, in India it's called a Second Green Revolution.
  • Not Synced
    And interestingly you know, when your former president Bush
  • Not Synced
    signed an agreement with our Prime Minister in 19... in 2005 on the nuclear deal,
  • Not Synced
    there was another piece of paper right there on the desk,
  • Not Synced
    which is an agriculture agreement
  • Not Synced
    to make genetic engineering _
  • Not Synced
    on the board of this agreement sit Monsanto, sit Walmart, and I think ConAgra.
  • Not Synced
    So our relationship now is very very intimate
  • Not Synced
    because it is the same companies
  • Not Synced
    that are preventing American farmers from having access to seed,
  • Not Synced
    and are preventing Indian farmers from not just having access to seed,
  • Not Synced
    but having access to life.
  • Not Synced
    The first GM crop introduced into India was in '98,
  • Not Synced
    and it's the Beattie cotton.
  • Not Synced
    I just call it the pesticide cotton.
  • Not Synced
    The Beattie cotton was brought in by Monsanto
  • Not Synced
    and Monsanto put these arrogant ads in the newspapers
  • Not Synced
    about how Indian farmers would have bulgar [wheat].
  • Not Synced
    So I started to ring up the ministries, and said have they sought approval?
  • Not Synced
    And of course nobody had been checked,
  • Not Synced
    because Monsanto had worked at dismantling laws in this country,
  • Not Synced
    so there's no regulation on genetic engineering in the U.S. at all.
  • Not Synced
    It's a de-regulated sector.
  • Not Synced
    And Monsanto thought you can walk into any country and assume there is no regulation,
  • Not Synced
    but we do have regulation.
  • Not Synced
    And so I took them to court, I sued them, took them to the Supreme Court.
  • Not Synced
    And the introduction was delayed up to 2005.
  • Not Synced
    Since 2005 they've started tosell Beattie cotton,
  • Not Synced
    and in certain areas there's only Beattie cotton available now.
  • Not Synced
    These are the areas where the farmers have the,
  • Not Synced
    where we have the highest rate of farmer suicides.
  • Not Synced
    In the last decade
  • Not Synced
    during which seed monopolies were established,\
  • Not Synced
    during which the global players started to buy up Indian companies,
  • Not Synced
    or have licensing arrangements with them,
  • Not Synced
    we have lost more than 200,000 farmers in suicides.
  • Not Synced
    We've of course lost 8 million farmers who had to leave the land.
  • Not Synced
    It's a combinatioin of seed monopolies and falling prices,
  • Not Synced
    linked to the subsidies, the 4 billion dollars in the case of cotton,
  • Not Synced
    and unfair trade rules.
  • Not Synced
    It's a genocidal packet that must destroy farmers.
  • Not Synced
    And doesn't kill farmers metaphorically.
  • Not Synced
    It kills farmers biologically.
  • Not Synced
    We started 2 years ago to work in this area.
  • Not Synced
    And the interesting thing is, by shifting to organic
  • Not Synced
    the farmers are earning 10 times more than the Beattie cotton farmers,
  • Not Synced
    even though every advertisement of Monsanto
  • Not Synced
    talks about how farmers earn more with GM crops.
  • Not Synced
    And that's also very interesting, you know,
  • Not Synced
    my mind kind of... gets very troubled every time I see a huge inconsistency.
  • Not Synced
    So why should you have seed monopolies for cheap food?
  • Not Synced
    Costly seed, cheap food.
  • Not Synced
    Something must be going funny in the middle.
  • Not Synced
    You get farmers to pay higher royalties,
  • Not Synced
    and they're supposed to have higher inomes, how?
  • Not Synced
    The aim of the seed industry is a trillion dollars of profits from royalties every year.
  • Not Synced
    And the aim is no farmer should have access to their own seed.
  • Not Synced
    The aim is every farmer should be forced into the market every year.
  • Not Synced
    And you can only do that by using multiple instruments of control over the seed.
  • Not Synced
    The first instrument as I mentioned is the intellectual property laws
  • Not Synced
    covering both patents as well as breeders rights that have become more and more like patents.
  • Not Synced
    Earlier they used to have farmers concessions,
  • Not Synced
    used to have breeders concessions,
  • Not Synced
    they've all gone in the new _
  • Not Synced
    the of 90/91, looks just like a patent law.
  • Not Synced
    And interestingly, a patent is supposed to be granted for an invention.
  • Not Synced
    A seed is not an invention.
  • Not Synced
    A seed exists before you can do anything with it.
  • Not Synced
    All you can do with the seed is manipulate it.
  • Not Synced
    Manipulation has never been treated as creation.
  • Not Synced
    It's often treated as cruelty.
  • Not Synced
    I would call GM cruelty to seed.
  • Not Synced
    Uh, and yet, there has been this claim to invention and therefore a right to ownership.
  • Not Synced
    Of course it's very interesting
  • Not Synced
    because it reflects a fundamental split, a fundamental schizophrenia
  • Not Synced
    When it comes to owning seeds and owning plants through patents,
  • Not Synced
    the same corporations go around saying
  • Not Synced
    "we've created something new, it's novel".
  • Not Synced
    The word used in the European laws is "novel foods".
  • Not Synced
    GM foods is not called GM foods, it's called "novel foods".
  • Not Synced
    And when it comes to people being concerned about the environmental risks, the health risks,
  • Not Synced
    the same industry comes around and says "just like nature made it".
  • Not Synced
    You're doing nothing new.
  • Not Synced
    This is like the bacteria in your yogurt, and...
  • Not Synced
    that's why they picked the word "biotechnology",
  • Not Synced
    and shed the word genetic engineering,
  • Not Synced
    because biotechnology was grandmother making cheese and yogurt,
  • Not Synced
    And SynGen and Monsanto were doing exactly what your grandmother did, nothing new.
  • Not Synced
    Except grandmother never took a patent, and you are taking a patent.
  • Not Synced
    [laughter]
  • Not Synced
    Now the legal term that has been created in the U.S. and has been spread around the world,
  • Not Synced
    a highly unscientific term that's used to make GM look natural,
  • Not Synced
    is "substantial equivalence".
  • Not Synced
    Treat the genetically engineered seed
  • Not Synced
    as equal to the parent.
  • Not Synced
    So don't look, don't see, don't find, declare safety.
  • Not Synced
    And anytime a scientist comes up with looking at what has happened,
  • Not Synced
    you make sure you hound that scientist out of their lab and their work.
  • Not Synced
    Especially with the new intimate relationship between universities and the companies,
  • Not Synced
    it's not that difficult.
  • Not Synced
    Over the last 20 years I've seen some of the top scientists with whom I worked
  • Not Synced
    been forced out of their university system
  • Not Synced
    just because they did an independent piece of research.
  • Not Synced
    Árpád Pusztai,
  • Not Synced
    Mae-Wan Ho.
  • Not Synced
    Ignacio Chapela, they tried with the Berkeley scientists,
  • Not Synced
    couldn't work it out because he just brought his chair in front of the Dean's office
  • Not Synced
    and said I won't move til you give me my tenure.
  • Not Synced
    And they were forced.
  • Not Synced
    Elaine Ingham from the University of Oregon
  • Not Synced
    did this amazing work on the impact of GM wheat,
  • Not Synced
    with the, with the soil bacterium, genes from a soil bacterium added to it,
  • Not Synced
    and that led in fact to the company, the German company, withdrawing that product;
  • Not Synced
    but it also led to the International Biosafety Protocol.
  • Not Synced
    She is now an independent scientist,
  • Not Synced
    but does not have a lab in the university.
  • Not Synced
    Um, so every time independent science is done,
  • Not Synced
    it's defined as "junk science",
  • Not Synced
    and "junk science" is institutionalized as real science, as good science.
  • Not Synced
    And these days you know the "good bank" thing?
  • Not Synced
    "Good bank", "bad bank" after they've created all this toxic assets, yah?
  • Not Synced
    Suddenly they're supposed to be a bad bank that'll take up all this corruption of the financial world.
  • Not Synced
    And again, interesting concept, yah?
  • Not Synced
    Concentrate toxicity, and it'll become neutralized.
  • Not Synced
    [laughter]
  • Not Synced
    The work we've been doing on suicides of farmers
  • Not Synced
    has started to have government response
  • Not Synced
    In the early days the government used to say
  • Not Synced
    "oh, they must have been alcoholics" or "they must have committed adultry",
  • Not Synced
    and I said "that's a large number of farmers suddenly becoming adulterers and alcoholics
  • Not Synced
    [laughter]
  • Not Synced
    and eventually the Prime Minister had to go down to these areas
  • Not Synced
    and recognize that farmer suicides linked to economic distress is a real phenomenon.
  • Not Synced
    So what does Monsanto do?
  • Not Synced
    Start using institutions to say there's no link between suicides and the Beattie cotton.
  • Not Synced
    The interesting thing is, the papers they generate,
  • Not Synced
    as one from IFPRI, which has been used a lot against me,
  • Not Synced
    the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington has put out a paper,
  • Not Synced
    goes round about the virtues of Beattie,
  • Not Synced
    as if everything is built into the seed;
  • Not Synced
    and then when it comes to the failure, or when it comes to the farmers going into distress,
  • Not Synced
    then it is no more about the seed itself,
  • Not Synced
    it's about the farmer who was stupid,
  • Not Synced
    it's about the soil that was wrong,
  • Not Synced
    and it's about the climate that didn't fit.
  • Not Synced
    And here again you have schizophrenia.
  • Not Synced
    Good performance -- in the GM seed.
  • Not Synced
    Bad performance -- you're to blame.
  • Not Synced
    So always there's a perpetuation of a mythology of the perfect seed.
  • Not Synced
    And interestingly the green revolution, when it was spread to India,
  • Not Synced
    they didn't just say "we're bringing you seeds that are more responsive to chemicals",
  • Not Synced
    which would have been the more honest way to describe it,
  • Not Synced
    rather than "high-yielding varieties".
  • Not Synced
    This [Norman Ernest] Borlaug, who was the scientist who did that dwarfing,
  • Not Synced
    interestingly he came out of the Dupont defence labs,
  • Not Synced
    knew about the chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    reworked the plants to be able to take mroe chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    just as genetic engineering is re-working the plants once more at a deeper genetic level,
  • Not Synced
    to be even more adaptive to chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    Borlaug said, of the 12 scientists he had trained, he called them his apostles.
  • Not Synced
    They were his wheat apostles distributing miracle seeds.
  • Not Synced
    So you do have a whole structure of seed monopolies
  • Not Synced
    enshrined within a new mythology,
  • Not Synced
    a new religion,
  • Not Synced
    where we are asked to be blind[sic] and not think any more.
  • Not Synced
    Interestingly, in the case of Indian sales, Monsanto actually recruits our gods as salesmen.
  • Not Synced
    Every poster, every video has a god.
  • Not Synced
    In northern state of Punjab, where the Sikhs are the most important religion,
  • Not Synced
    and Guru Nanak was the founder of that religion,
  • Not Synced
    Guru Nanak is used as a salesman.
  • Not Synced
    In south India out of the you get Hanuman who brought this herb to save the life of Hanuman's brother,
  • Not Synced
    you have Hanuman bringing you this life-saving seed,
  • Not Synced
    which is really the killing seed.
  • Not Synced
    That's another way in which seed monopolies are established.
  • Not Synced
    Seed monopolies are also established by introducing seed replacement.
  • Not Synced
    And whenever I debate with our government, I always tell them, I say
  • Not Synced
    "you know, seeds are not like dirty socks. When your socks start to stink, you'd better change them.
  • Not Synced
    And wash them.
  • Not Synced
    But seeds are perrennia, they don't get replaced,
  • Not Synced
    you evolve them, you breed them, you adapt them, but you don't throw them out."
  • Not Synced
    They're not like a new model of a car either.
  • Not Synced
    Seeds are life itself,
  • Not Synced
    and therefore, seed replacement is wrong.
  • Not Synced
    Now, you can only have a monopoly on seed through patenet
  • Not Synced
    if you have had a closure on the alternative supply,
  • Not Synced
    because why on earth would farmers pay royalties every year
  • Not Synced
    if they could have free seed they can save year in and year out?
  • Not Synced
    To create that closure,
  • Not Synced
    the industry has evolved compulsory licensing and registration laws,
  • Not Synced
    compulsory registration, compulsory licensing laws,\
  • Not Synced
    which basically mean farmers can't have their own seed,
  • Not Synced
    they must only grow seeds that are licensed,
  • Not Synced
    they must have approval from the state.
  • Not Synced
    But an indigenous seed evolved and bred by farmers,
  • Not Synced
    an open for pollenated variety seed has never done harm to anyone.
  • Not Synced
    GM seeds can cause genetic contamination,
  • Not Synced
    but an open pollenated variety has no harm,
  • Not Synced
    and since it has no harm,
  • Not Synced
    there is absolutely no need for state regulation.
  • Not Synced
    The state regulates the harmful.
  • Not Synced
    It should not invade into the harmless zones of life.
  • Not Synced
    The interesting thing is, they tried to introduce this law in 2004 in India,
  • Not Synced
    it's called the New Seed Law.
  • Not Synced
    It's not that we don't have a seed law, we have a seed law,
  • Not Synced
    but it doesn't prevent farmers from having their own seed,
  • Not Synced
    it merely regulated the industry.
  • Not Synced
    Now they want to have farmers regulated,
  • Not Synced
    and the seed industry, now the biotech industry, de-regulated.
  • Not Synced
    So we did what Gandhi had done in 1930.
  • Not Synced
    You might remember the British had tried to monopolize salt,
  • Not Synced
    just so they could buy bigger guns so they could control us better,
  • Not Synced
    and the Salt Laws were meant to make salt-making illegal by Indians.
  • Not Synced
    Only the British could make the salt.\
  • Not Synced
    And Gandhi walked to the beach and picked up the salt,
  • Not Synced
    and said (not verbatim) "nature gives this for free. We need it for our survival.
  • Not Synced
    We will continue to make salt. We are forced to disobey your laws."
  • Not Synced
    And, uh, the Salt Laws never worked in India.
  • Not Synced
    People went to jail, people were killed, but the Salt Laws never worked in India.
  • Not Synced
    So we took inspiration from that,
  • Not Synced
    and have been doing what we call the seed सत्य के लिए लड़ाई.
  • Not Synced
    The सत्य के लिए लड़ाई means "the fight for truth".
  • Not Synced
    Beginning '91 when these monopolies were created,
  • Not Synced
    we've had rally after rally,
  • Not Synced
    half a million farmers, 2 million farmers,
  • Not Synced
    basically declaring that seed is a common resource,
  • Not Synced
    we have received it from our ancestors,
  • Not Synced
    we have to protect it for future generations,
  • Not Synced
    of all species, because seed doesn't just belong to humans,
  • Not Synced
    it belongs to allt he species who are nourished by any species of plant.
  • Not Synced
    We will therefore not obey a law
  • Not Synced
    that makes it illegal for us to perform our highest ecological duty on earth,
  • Not Synced
    which is to save seeds for the future.
  • Not Synced
    [applause]
  • Not Synced
    So in 2004 we stopped this law from coming into force.
  • Not Synced
    I gave I don't know how many millions of signatures I gave to our Prime Minister,
  • Not Synced
    and said you can do what the British did with teh Salt Law.
  • Not Synced
    We are not going to obey, because we have to obey a higher law.
  • Not Synced
    Monsanto law is a low law, degraded law,
  • Not Synced
    and any law restricting farmers rights is in today's world a Monsanto law.
  • Not Synced
    Even when governments write it,
  • Not Synced
    an invisible hand of Monsanto is behind that writing.
  • Not Synced
    So how do we create seed freedom
  • Not Synced
    in this time of seed imperialism, seed colonialism, seed closure?
  • Not Synced
    We do it by creating community seedbanks,
  • Not Synced
    that's how I started Navdanya 21 years ago,
  • Not Synced
    just saving every seed available,and distributing it widely,
  • Not Synced
    keeping it as an open access system.
  • Not Synced
    Every farmer of Navdanya, and we have about 400,000 members,
  • Not Synced
    every farmer, the only yhing they have to do is take a pledge
  • Not Synced
    that seed will never be used as an exclusive right.
  • Not Synced
    Not by them, not by anyone else.
  • Not Synced
    They will continue to share seed, and they will continue to save seed.
  • Not Synced
    In the area of the suicides, we have managed to save seeds and bring farmers organic options back.
  • Not Synced
    We've also just finished some research
  • Not Synced
    to show that Beattie cotton has destroyed in 3 years of planting,
  • Not Synced
    26% of vital micro organisms in the soil.
  • Not Synced
    So organic is the only way to rebuild it. 40:35
  • Not Synced
    We have created climate resilient seed banks.
  • Not Synced
    Banks where seeds for high drought tolerance, hight flood tolerance, salt tolerance are available
  • Not Synced
    And we've distributed every time there's a disaster,
  • Not Synced
    a drought in central India,
  • Not Synced
    even after the tsunami, the salt tolerant rices, we took two truckloads of these things.
  • Not Synced
    Interestingly, Monsanto, which has beena leader in biopiracy and SynGen and the biotech industry,
  • Not Synced
    is now trying to patent the climate-resilient traits,
  • Not Synced
    which they can't create because genetic engineering is a very linear, single-gene expression technology.
  • Not Synced
    Climate resilience is a multi-genetic trait,but all they're doing is genetic mapping.
  • Not Synced
    And these days, computers do it, you don't even need a human being.
  • Not Synced
    In fact, if there's a property right, they should give it to that machine
  • Not Synced
    [laughter]
  • Not Synced
    because they're not doing the thinking, they're not doing the creation,
  • Not Synced
    it's an assemby line of doing the genome mapping.
  • Not Synced
    The map is being used to claim ownership,
  • Not Synced
    and we are going to start a big campaign
  • Not Synced
    to not just keep seeds in the open domain,
  • Not Synced
    but especially seeds required for climate adaption
  • Not Synced
    as a common resource for our common defence in these vilnerable times.
  • Not Synced
    We will of course have to make very rapid and radical shifts very fast,
  • Not Synced
    from breeding for responding to chemicals,
  • Not Synced
    to breeding for resilience, adaption.
  • Not Synced
    From breeding for a single yield trait,
  • Not Synced
    to breeding for nutrition and taste and quality.
  • Not Synced
    We've done a lot of research with native varieties,
  • Not Synced
    they always have higher nitritional quality.
  • Not Synced
    So we should be measuring nutrition per crop,
  • Not Synced
    and nutrition per acre,
  • Not Synced
    not just the mass produced.
  • Not Synced
    What's the point of empty mass?
  • Not Synced
    Empty mass doesnt nourish our bodies.
  • Not Synced
    Empty mass doesn't nourish the soil.
  • Not Synced
    We need to go back, seriously,
  • Not Synced
    to the issue of quality, the issue of nutrition, the issue of life itself.
  • Not Synced
    Saving seed, for me, is defending life,
  • Not Synced
    and saving seeds in these vulnerable times
  • Not Synced
    is making sure we can imagine with hope
  • Not Synced
    that life will continue in all its vibrance, in all its diversity, in all its beauty.
  • Not Synced
    Thank you.
  • Not Synced
    [applause]
  • Not Synced
    [narrator] You've been listening to physicist, ecologist, and author Vandana Shiva,
  • Not Synced
    speaking at the organic ecology conference in Portland Oregon of February 28, 2009.
  • Not Synced
    In a moment we'll return to the question and answer session from the presentation.
  • Not Synced
    Vandana Shiva, a physicist, feminist, philosopher of science, and science policy advocate,
  • Not Synced
    is the director of the research Foundation for Science, Technology, and Natural Resource Policy.
  • Not Synced
    She is the 1993 recipient of the Right Livelihood Award,
  • Not Synced
    and serves as ecology advisor to several organizations,
  • Not Synced
    including the Third World Network, and the Asia Pacific Peoples Environment Network.
  • Not Synced
    Her books include
  • Not Synced
    Her latest book is
  • Not Synced
    To find out more about Vandana Shiva and her work, please visit the Navdanya website at
  • Not Synced
    And now we return to the question and answer session from the program.
  • Not Synced
    [question] Good morning, I just had a question that relates to the speaker that we had yesterday,
  • Not Synced
    Paul Roberts,
  • Not Synced
    and, um, he mentioned, someone asked a question about local food,
  • Not Synced
    and the possibilities of around the world being able to raise our own food,
  • Not Synced
    enough food for ourselves where we live right now with climate change,
  • Not Synced
    and our expectaitons of what we should be able to eat, um, seasonality and that kind of thing.
  • Not Synced
    And in response to this, one of the things that he said was that
  • Not Synced
    in many of the Asian countries
  • Not Synced
    that at the rate of population growth, um,
  • Not Synced
    they will not be able to sustain themselves using sustainable agriculture practices,
  • Not Synced
    um, and be able to feed themselves.
  • Not Synced
    And one thing that we can do here in the United States and North America
  • Not Synced
    is to be able to, using sustainable practices, grow enough food
  • Not Synced
    so that we will be able to ship food to Asian countries, um, preventing starvation.
  • Not Synced
    And I was just wondering if you could address this idea
  • Not Synced
    of local food and with population raising all the time,
  • Not Synced
    being able to feed, everyone being able to feed themselves where they are, for themselves.
  • Not Synced
    [Vandana Shiva]
  • Not Synced
    The first thing about local food is that the tropics lend themselves better to producing mroe food..
  • Not Synced
    And for anyone who thinks a temperate climate and cultivation in deserts
  • Not Synced
    based on mining aquifers,
  • Not Synced
    has to be the basis of providing food to the world,
  • Not Synced
    and Asian countries, most of which are tropical countries,
  • Not Synced
    a little bit of China is outside the tropics,
  • Not Synced
    but I mean you go from India into Indonesia, and Malaysia, should see the abundance.
  • Not Synced
    We have a report, you can get this from our website, Navdanya.org,
  • Not Synced
    and it's on biodiversity based productivity.
  • Not Synced
    We've done survey after survey of hundreds of farms, including our organic farms.
  • Not Synced
    The food production is double, sometimes five fold more.
  • Not Synced
    The reason it's not seen is because
  • Not Synced
    the agricultural paradigm has been reduced to a monoculture of commodities,
  • Not Synced
    then you focus on the commodities
  • Not Synced
    and say they can't produce more commodities,
  • Not Synced
    but we can produce mroe food.
Title:
Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Description:

Scientist, feminist, ecologist and author, Vandana Shiva, presenting the keynote address at the 2009 Organicology Conference in Portland, Oregon, on February 28, 2009.

pdxjustice Media Productions
Producer: William Seaman

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Duration:
59:55
Radical Access Mapping Project edited English subtitles for Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Radical Access Mapping Project edited English subtitles for Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Radical Access Mapping Project edited English subtitles for Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Radical Access Mapping Project edited English subtitles for Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Radical Access Mapping Project edited English subtitles for Vandana Shiva - The Future of Food and Seed
Radical Access Mapping Project added a translation

English subtitles

Incomplete

Revisions