Return to Video

Matematika ljubavi

  • Not Synced
    1
    00:00:00,303 --> 00:00:04,941
    Danas bih vam htjela reći poneto
    o matematici ljubavi.
    2
    00:00:04,941 --> 00:00:06,681
    Now, I think that we can all agree
  • Not Synced
    3
    00:00:06,681 --> 00:00:11,597
    that mathematicians
    are famously excellent at finding love.
  • Not Synced
    4
    00:00:11,597 --> 00:00:15,045
    But it's not just
    because of our dashing personalities,
  • Not Synced
    5
    00:00:15,045 --> 00:00:19,544
    superior conversational skills
    and excellent pencil cases.
  • Not Synced
    6
    00:00:19,544 --> 00:00:24,070
    It's also because we've actually done
    an awful lot of work into the maths
  • Not Synced
    7
    00:00:24,070 --> 00:00:26,462
    of how to find the perfect partner.
  • Not Synced
    8
    00:00:26,462 --> 00:00:29,875
    Now, in my favorite paper
    on the subject, which is entitled,
  • Not Synced
    9
    00:00:29,875 --> 00:00:33,371
    "Why I Don't Have a Girlfriend" --
    (Laughter) --
  • Not Synced
    10
    00:00:33,371 --> 00:00:37,091
    Peter Backus tries to rate
    his chances of finding love.
  • Not Synced
    11
    00:00:37,091 --> 00:00:39,457
    Now, Peter's not a very greedy man.
  • Not Synced
    12
    00:00:39,457 --> 00:00:41,542
    Of all of the available women in the U.K.,
  • Not Synced
    13
    00:00:41,542 --> 00:00:44,955
    all Peter's looking for
    is somebody who lives near him,
  • Not Synced
    14
    00:00:44,955 --> 00:00:46,856
    somebody in the right age range,
  • Not Synced
    15
    00:00:46,856 --> 00:00:49,666
    somebody with a university degree,
  • Not Synced
    16
    00:00:49,666 --> 00:00:51,824
    somebody he's likely to get on well with,
  • Not Synced
    17
    00:00:51,824 --> 00:00:53,900
    somebody who's likely to be attractive,
  • Not Synced
    18
    00:00:53,900 --> 00:00:56,438
    somebody who's likely
    to find him attractive.
  • Not Synced
    19
    00:00:56,438 --> 00:00:59,441
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    20
    00:00:59,441 --> 00:01:04,427
    And comes up with an estimate
    of 26 women in the whole of the UK.
  • Not Synced
    21
    00:01:05,441 --> 00:01:07,602
    It's not looking very good,
    is it Peter?
  • Not Synced
    22
    00:01:07,602 --> 00:01:09,469
    Now, just to put that into perspective,
  • Not Synced
    23
    00:01:09,469 --> 00:01:12,574
    that's about 400 times fewer
    than the best estimates
  • Not Synced
    24
    00:01:12,574 --> 00:01:16,799
    of how many intelligent
    extraterrestrial life forms there are.
  • Not Synced
    25
    00:01:16,799 --> 00:01:21,676
    And it also gives Peter
    a 1 in 285,000 chance
  • Not Synced
    26
    00:01:21,676 --> 00:01:23,902
    of bumping into any one
    of these special ladies
  • Not Synced
    27
    00:01:23,902 --> 00:01:25,288
    on a given night out.
  • Not Synced
    28
    00:01:25,288 --> 00:01:27,491
    I'd like to think
    that's why mathematicians
  • Not Synced
    29
    00:01:27,491 --> 00:01:30,915
    don't really bother
    going on nights out anymore.
  • Not Synced
    30
    00:01:30,915 --> 00:01:32,644
    The thing is that I personally
  • Not Synced
    31
    00:01:32,644 --> 00:01:35,373
    don't subscribe
    to such a pessimistic view.
  • Not Synced
    32
    00:01:35,373 --> 00:01:37,602
    Because I know,
    just as well as all of you do,
  • Not Synced
    33
    00:01:37,602 --> 00:01:40,194
    that love doesn't really work like that.
  • Not Synced
    34
    00:01:40,194 --> 00:01:45,304
    Human emotion isn't neatly ordered
    and rational and easily predictable.
  • Not Synced
    35
    00:01:45,304 --> 00:01:47,711
    But I also know that that doesn't mean
  • Not Synced
    36
    00:01:47,711 --> 00:01:51,015
    that mathematics hasn't got something
    that it can offer us
  • Not Synced
    37
    00:01:51,015 --> 00:01:54,966
    because, love, as with most of life,
    is full of patterns
  • Not Synced
    38
    00:01:54,966 --> 00:01:59,042
    and mathematics is, ultimately,
    all about the study of patterns.
  • Not Synced
    39
    00:01:59,042 --> 00:02:03,345
    Patterns from predicting the weather
    to the fluctuations in the stock market,
  • Not Synced
    40
    00:02:03,345 --> 00:02:06,750
    to the movement of the planets
    or the growth of cities.
  • Not Synced
    41
    00:02:06,750 --> 00:02:09,454
    And if we're being honest,
    none of those things
  • Not Synced
    42
    00:02:09,454 --> 00:02:12,850
    are exactly neatly ordered
    and easily predictable, either.
  • Not Synced
    43
    00:02:12,850 --> 00:02:17,877
    Because I believe that mathematics
    is so powerful that it has the potential
  • Not Synced
    44
    00:02:17,877 --> 00:02:21,631
    to offer us a new way of looking
    at almost anything.
  • Not Synced
    45
    00:02:21,631 --> 00:02:25,187
    Even something as mysterious as love.
  • Not Synced
    46
    00:02:25,187 --> 00:02:26,675
    And so, to try to persuade you
  • Not Synced
    47
    00:02:26,675 --> 00:02:31,236
    of how totally amazing, excellent
    and relevant mathematics is,
  • Not Synced
    48
    00:02:31,236 --> 00:02:39,220
    I want to give you my top three
    mathematically verifiable tips for love.
  • Not Synced
    49
    00:02:39,980 --> 00:02:41,939
    Okay, so Top Tip #1:
  • Not Synced
    50
    00:02:41,939 --> 00:02:44,903
    How to win at online dating.
  • Not Synced
    51
    00:02:46,323 --> 00:02:50,159
    So my favorite online dating
    website is OkCupid,
  • Not Synced
    52
    00:02:50,159 --> 00:02:53,574
    not least because it was started
    by a group of mathematicians.
  • Not Synced
    53
    00:02:53,574 --> 00:02:55,343
    Now, because they're mathematicians,
  • Not Synced
    54
    00:02:55,343 --> 00:02:57,083
    they have been collecting data
  • Not Synced
    55
    00:02:57,083 --> 00:02:59,936
    on everybody who uses their site
    for almost a decade.
  • Not Synced
    56
    00:02:59,936 --> 00:03:02,200
    And they've been trying
    to search for patterns
  • Not Synced
    57
    00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,067
    in the way that we talk about ourselves
  • Not Synced
    58
    00:03:04,067 --> 00:03:06,184
    and the way that we
    interact with each other
  • Not Synced
    59
    00:03:06,184 --> 00:03:07,876
    on an online dating website.
  • Not Synced
    60
    00:03:07,876 --> 00:03:10,825
    And they've come up with some
    seriously interesting findings.
  • Not Synced
    61
    00:03:10,825 --> 00:03:12,447
    But my particular favorite
  • Not Synced
    62
    00:03:12,447 --> 00:03:15,827
    is that it turns out
    that on an online dating website,
  • Not Synced
    63
    00:03:15,827 --> 00:03:21,672
    how attractive you are
    does not dictate how popular you are,
  • Not Synced
    64
    00:03:21,679 --> 00:03:25,391
    and actually, having people
    think that you're ugly
  • Not Synced
    65
    00:03:25,391 --> 00:03:28,260
    can work to your advantage.
  • Not Synced
    66
    00:03:28,260 --> 00:03:30,066
    Let me show you how this works.
  • Not Synced
    67
    00:03:30,066 --> 00:03:34,565
    In a thankfully voluntary
    section of OkCupid,
  • Not Synced
    68
    00:03:34,565 --> 00:03:37,565
    you are allowed to rate
    how attractive you think people are
  • Not Synced
    69
    00:03:37,565 --> 00:03:40,022
    on a scale between 1 and 5.
  • Not Synced
    70
    00:03:40,022 --> 00:03:43,362
    Now, if we compare this score,
    the average score,
  • Not Synced
    71
    00:03:43,362 --> 00:03:46,216
    to how many messages a
    selection of people receive,
  • Not Synced
    72
    00:03:46,216 --> 00:03:47,876
    you can begin to get a sense
  • Not Synced
    73
    00:03:47,876 --> 00:03:51,854
    of how attractiveness links to popularity
    on an online dating website.
  • Not Synced
    74
    00:03:51,854 --> 00:03:55,177
    This is the graph that the OkCupid guys
    have come up with.
  • Not Synced
    75
    00:03:55,177 --> 00:03:58,230
    And the important thing to notice
    is that it's not totally true
  • Not Synced
    76
    00:03:58,230 --> 00:04:01,058
    that the more attractive you are,
    the more messages you get.
  • Not Synced
    77
    00:04:01,058 --> 00:04:04,932
    But the question arises then
    of what is it about people up here
  • Not Synced
    78
    00:04:04,932 --> 00:04:09,566
    who are so much more popular
    than people down here,
  • Not Synced
    79
    00:04:09,566 --> 00:04:12,170
    even though they have the
    same score of attractiveness?
  • Not Synced
    80
    00:04:12,170 --> 00:04:16,699
    And the reason why is that it's not just
    straightforward looks that are important.
  • Not Synced
    81
    00:04:16,699 --> 00:04:19,477
    So let me try to illustrate their
    findings with an example.
  • Not Synced
    82
    00:04:19,477 --> 00:04:23,607
    So if you take someone like
    Portia de Rossi, for example,
  • Not Synced
    83
    00:04:23,607 --> 00:04:28,279
    everybody agrees that Portia de Rossi
    is a very beautiful woman.
  • Not Synced
    84
    00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:31,940
    Nobody thinks that she's ugly,
    but she's not a supermodel, either.
  • Not Synced
    85
    00:04:31,940 --> 00:04:36,561
    If you compare Portia de Rossi
    to someone like Sarah Jessica Parker,
  • Not Synced
    86
    00:04:36,561 --> 00:04:39,846
    now, a lot of people,
    myself included, I should say,
  • Not Synced
    87
    00:04:39,846 --> 00:04:44,320
    think that Sarah Jessica Parker
    is seriously fabulous
  • Not Synced
    88
    00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:46,990
    and possibly one of the
    most beautiful creatures
  • Not Synced
    89
    00:04:46,990 --> 00:04:49,639
    to have ever have walked
    on the face of the Earth.
  • Not Synced
    90
    00:04:49,639 --> 00:04:55,660
    But some other people,
    i.e., most of the Internet,
  • Not Synced
    91
    00:04:55,660 --> 00:05:01,838
    seem to think that she looks
    a bit like a horse. (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    92
    00:05:01,838 --> 00:05:05,098
    Now, I think that if you ask people
    how attractive they thought
  • Not Synced
    93
    00:05:05,098 --> 00:05:07,260
    Sarah Jessica Parker
    or Portia de Rossi were,
  • Not Synced
    94
    00:05:07,260 --> 00:05:10,213
    and you ask them to give
    them a score between 1 and 5,
  • Not Synced
    95
    00:05:10,213 --> 00:05:13,218
    I reckon that they'd average out
    to have roughly the same score.
  • Not Synced
    96
    00:05:13,218 --> 00:05:15,979
    But the way that people would vote
    would be very different.
  • Not Synced
    97
    00:05:15,979 --> 00:05:18,522
    So Portia's scores would
    all be clustered around the 4
  • Not Synced
    98
    00:05:18,522 --> 00:05:20,982
    because everybody agrees
    that she's very beautiful,
  • Not Synced
    99
    00:05:20,982 --> 00:05:23,643
    whereas Sarah Jessica Parker
    completely divides opinion.
  • Not Synced
    100
    00:05:23,643 --> 00:05:26,067
    There'd be a huge spread in her scores.
  • Not Synced
    101
    00:05:26,067 --> 00:05:28,389
    And actually it's this spread that counts.
  • Not Synced
    102
    00:05:28,389 --> 00:05:30,865
    It's this spread
    that makes you more popular
  • Not Synced
    103
    00:05:30,865 --> 00:05:33,065
    on an online Internet dating website.
  • Not Synced
    104
    00:05:33,065 --> 00:05:34,236
    So what that means then
  • Not Synced
    105
    00:05:34,236 --> 00:05:36,735
    is that if some people
    think that you're attractive,
  • Not Synced
    106
    00:05:36,735 --> 00:05:38,683
    you're actually better off
  • Not Synced
    107
    00:05:38,683 --> 00:05:43,935
    having some other people
    think that you're a massive minger.
  • Not Synced
    108
    00:05:43,935 --> 00:05:46,173
    That's much better
    than everybody just thinking
  • Not Synced
    109
    00:05:46,173 --> 00:05:47,904
    that you're the cute girl next door.
  • Not Synced
    110
    00:05:47,904 --> 00:05:50,153
    Now, I think this begins
    makes a bit more sense
  • Not Synced
    111
    00:05:50,153 --> 00:05:53,387
    when you think in terms of the people
    who are sending these messages.
  • Not Synced
    112
    00:05:53,387 --> 00:05:55,738
    So let's say that you think
    somebody's attractive,
  • Not Synced
    113
    00:05:55,738 --> 00:05:59,992
    but you suspect that other people
    won't necessarily be that interested.
  • Not Synced
    114
    00:05:59,992 --> 00:06:02,543
    That means there's
    less competition for you
  • Not Synced
    115
    00:06:02,543 --> 00:06:04,979
    and it's an extra incentive
    for you to get in touch.
  • Not Synced
    116
    00:06:04,979 --> 00:06:07,803
    Whereas compare that
    to if you think somebody is attractive
  • Not Synced
    117
    00:06:07,803 --> 00:06:11,060
    but you suspect that everybody
    is going to think they're attractive.
  • Not Synced
    118
    00:06:11,060 --> 00:06:14,624
    Well, why would you bother
    humiliating yourself, let's be honest?
  • Not Synced
    119
    00:06:14,628 --> 00:06:16,904
    Here's where the really
    interesting part comes.
  • Not Synced
    120
    00:06:16,904 --> 00:06:21,378
    Because when people choose the pictures
    that they use on an online dating website,
  • Not Synced
    121
    00:06:21,378 --> 00:06:23,670
    they often try to minimize the things
  • Not Synced
    122
    00:06:23,670 --> 00:06:27,160
    that they think some people
    will find unattractive.
  • Not Synced
    123
    00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:31,457
    The classic example is people
    who are, perhaps, a little bit overweight
  • Not Synced
    124
    00:06:31,457 --> 00:06:34,921
    deliberately choosing
    a very cropped photo,
  • Not Synced
    125
    00:06:34,921 --> 00:06:36,678
    or bald men, for example,
  • Not Synced
    126
    00:06:36,678 --> 00:06:39,477
    deliberately choosing pictures
    where they're wearing hats.
  • Not Synced
    127
    00:06:39,477 --> 00:06:42,142
    But actually this is the opposite
    of what you should do
  • Not Synced
    128
    00:06:42,142 --> 00:06:43,536
    if you want to be successful.
  • Not Synced
    129
    00:06:43,536 --> 00:06:48,347
    You should really, instead, play up to
    whatever it is that makes you different,
  • Not Synced
    130
    00:06:48,356 --> 00:06:52,300
    even if you think that some people
    will find it unattractive.
  • Not Synced
    131
    00:06:52,300 --> 00:06:55,544
    Because the people who fancy you
    are just going to fancy you anyway,
  • Not Synced
    132
    00:06:55,544 --> 00:07:00,485
    and the unimportant losers who don't,
    well, they only play up to your advantage.
  • Not Synced
    133
    00:07:00,497 --> 00:07:02,897
    Okay, Top Tip #2:
    How to pick the perfect partner.
  • Not Synced
    134
    00:07:02,897 --> 00:07:05,624
    So let's imagine then
    that you're a roaring success
  • Not Synced
    135
    00:07:05,624 --> 00:07:07,092
    on the dating scene.
  • Not Synced
    136
    00:07:07,092 --> 00:07:11,395
    But the question arises
    of how do you then convert that success
  • Not Synced
    137
    00:07:11,395 --> 00:07:15,179
    into longer-term happiness
    and in particular,
  • Not Synced
    138
    00:07:15,186 --> 00:07:19,437
    how do you decide
    when is the right time to settle down?
  • Not Synced
    139
    00:07:19,437 --> 00:07:22,269
    Now generally,
    it's not advisable to just cash in
  • Not Synced
    140
    00:07:22,269 --> 00:07:24,292
    and marry the first person
    who comes along
  • Not Synced
    141
    00:07:24,292 --> 00:07:26,505
    and shows you any interest at all.
  • Not Synced
    142
    00:07:26,505 --> 00:07:29,659
    But, equally, you don't really
    want to leave it too long
  • Not Synced
    143
    00:07:29,659 --> 00:07:32,661
    if you want to maximize your
    chance of long-term happiness.
  • Not Synced
    144
    00:07:32,661 --> 00:07:35,843
    As my favorite author,
    Jane Austen, puts it,
  • Not Synced
    145
    00:07:35,843 --> 00:07:38,061
    "An unmarried woman of seven and twenty
  • Not Synced
    146
    00:07:38,061 --> 00:07:41,726
    can never hope to feel or
    inspire affection again."
  • Not Synced
    147
    00:07:41,726 --> 00:07:43,718
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    148
    00:07:43,718 --> 00:07:47,272
    Thanks a lot, Jane.
    What do you know about love?
  • Not Synced
    149
    00:07:47,836 --> 00:07:49,391
    So the question is then,
  • Not Synced
    150
    00:07:49,391 --> 00:07:51,996
    how do you know when
    is the right time to settle down
  • Not Synced
    151
    00:07:51,996 --> 00:07:54,675
    given all the people
    that you can date in your lifetime?
  • Not Synced
    152
    00:07:54,675 --> 00:07:58,350
    Thankfully, there's a rather delicious bit
    of mathematics that we can use
  • Not Synced
    153
    00:07:58,350 --> 00:08:00,874
    to help us out here, called
    optimal stopping theory.
  • Not Synced
    154
    00:08:00,874 --> 00:08:02,774
    So let's imagine then,
  • Not Synced
    155
    00:08:02,774 --> 00:08:05,044
    that you start dating when you're 15
  • Not Synced
    156
    00:08:05,044 --> 00:08:09,128
    and ideally, you'd like to be married
    by the time that you're 35.
  • Not Synced
    157
    00:08:09,128 --> 00:08:10,668
    And there's a number of people
  • Not Synced
    158
    00:08:10,668 --> 00:08:13,154
    that you could potentially
    date across your lifetime,
  • Not Synced
    159
    00:08:13,154 --> 00:08:15,308
    and they'll be at varying
    levels of goodness.
  • Not Synced
    160
    00:08:15,308 --> 00:08:18,199
    Now the rules are that once
    you cash in and get married,
  • Not Synced
    161
    00:08:18,199 --> 00:08:20,902
    you can't look ahead to see
    what you could have had,
  • Not Synced
    162
    00:08:20,902 --> 00:08:23,512
    and equally, you can't go back
    and change your mind.
  • Not Synced
    163
    00:08:23,512 --> 00:08:25,082
    In my experience at least,
  • Not Synced
    164
    00:08:25,082 --> 00:08:27,904
    I find that typically people don't
    much like being recalled
  • Not Synced
    165
    00:08:27,904 --> 00:08:33,320
    years after being passed up
    for somebody else, or that's just me.
  • Not Synced
    166
    00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:36,527
    So the math says then
    that what you should do
  • Not Synced
    167
    00:08:36,527 --> 00:08:39,558
    in the first 37 percent
    of your dating window,
  • Not Synced
    168
    00:08:39,558 --> 00:08:43,999
    you should just reject everybody
    as serious marriage potential.
  • Not Synced
    169
    00:08:43,999 --> 00:08:45,513
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    170
    00:08:45,513 --> 00:08:49,319
    And then, you should pick the
    next person that comes along
  • Not Synced
    171
    00:08:49,319 --> 00:08:52,154
    that is better than everybody
    that you've seen before.
  • Not Synced
    172
    00:08:52,154 --> 00:08:53,476
    So here's the example.
  • Not Synced
    173
    00:08:53,476 --> 00:08:56,308
    Now if you do this, it can be
    mathematically proven, in fact,
  • Not Synced
    174
    00:08:56,308 --> 00:08:58,975
    that this is the best possible way
  • Not Synced
    175
    00:08:58,975 --> 00:09:03,437
    of maximizing your chances
    of finding the perfect partner.
  • Not Synced
    176
    00:09:03,437 --> 00:09:07,909
    Now unfortunately, I have to tell you that
    this method does come with some risks.
  • Not Synced
    177
    00:09:08,382 --> 00:09:13,072
    For instance, imagine if
    your perfect partner appeared
  • Not Synced
    178
    00:09:13,072 --> 00:09:16,226
    during your first 37 percent.
  • Not Synced
    179
    00:09:16,226 --> 00:09:18,939
    Now, unfortunately,
    you'd have to reject them.
  • Not Synced
    180
    00:09:18,939 --> 00:09:21,652
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    181
    00:09:21,652 --> 00:09:23,997
    Now, if you're following the maths,
  • Not Synced
    182
    00:09:23,997 --> 00:09:25,663
    I'm afraid no one else comes along
  • Not Synced
    183
    00:09:25,663 --> 00:09:27,790
    that's better than anyone
    you've seen before,
  • Not Synced
    184
    00:09:27,790 --> 00:09:32,093
    so you have to go on
    rejecting everyone and die alone.
  • Not Synced
    185
    00:09:32,093 --> 00:09:33,776
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    186
    00:09:34,736 --> 00:09:39,617
    Probably surrounded by cats
    nibbling at your remains.
  • Not Synced
    187
    00:09:39,617 --> 00:09:43,422
    Okay, another risk is,
    let's imagine, instead,
  • Not Synced
    188
    00:09:43,422 --> 00:09:46,667
    that the first people that you dated
    in your first 37 percent
  • Not Synced
    189
    00:09:46,667 --> 00:09:50,507
    are just incredibly dull,
    boring, terrible people.
  • Not Synced
    190
    00:09:50,507 --> 00:09:53,232
    Now, that's okay, because
    you're in your rejection phase,
  • Not Synced
    191
    00:09:53,232 --> 00:09:55,073
    so thats fine,
    you can reject them.
  • Not Synced
    192
    00:09:55,073 --> 00:09:58,541
    But then imagine, the next
    person to come along
  • Not Synced
    193
    00:09:58,541 --> 00:10:02,879
    is just marginally less boring,
    dull and terrible
  • Not Synced
    194
    00:10:02,879 --> 00:10:04,761
    than everybody that you've seen before.
  • Not Synced
    195
    00:10:04,761 --> 00:10:08,963
    Now, if you are following the maths,
    I'm afraid you have to marry them
  • Not Synced
    196
    00:10:08,963 --> 00:10:12,376
    and end up in a relationship
    which is, frankly, suboptimal.
  • Not Synced
    197
    00:10:12,376 --> 00:10:13,459
    Sorry about that.
  • Not Synced
    198
    00:10:13,459 --> 00:10:15,659
    But I do think that there's
    an opportunity here
  • Not Synced
    199
    00:10:15,659 --> 00:10:18,809
    for Hallmark to cash in on
    and really cater for this market.
  • Not Synced
    200
    00:10:18,809 --> 00:10:20,899
    A Valentine's Day card like this.
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    201
    00:10:20,899 --> 00:10:24,924
    "My darling husband, you
    are marginally less terrible
  • Not Synced
    202
    00:10:24,924 --> 00:10:27,969
    than the first 37 percent
    of people I dated."
  • Not Synced
    203
    00:10:27,969 --> 00:10:33,456
    It's actually more romantic
    than I normally manage.
  • Not Synced
    204
    00:10:33,456 --> 00:10:38,138
    Okay, so this method doesn't give
    you a 100 percent success rate,
  • Not Synced
    205
    00:10:38,138 --> 00:10:41,441
    but there's no other possible
    strategy that can do any better.
  • Not Synced
    206
    00:10:41,441 --> 00:10:44,104
    And actually, in the wild,
    there are certain types
  • Not Synced
    207
    00:10:44,104 --> 00:10:47,817
    of fish which follow and
    employ this exact strategy.
  • Not Synced
    208
    00:10:47,817 --> 00:10:50,456
    So they reject every possible
    suitor that turns up
  • Not Synced
    209
    00:10:50,456 --> 00:10:53,413
    in the first 37 percent
    of the mating season,
  • Not Synced
    210
    00:10:53,413 --> 00:10:56,944
    and then they pick the next fish
    that comes along after that window
  • Not Synced
    211
    00:10:56,944 --> 00:10:59,000
    that's, I don't know, bigger and burlier
  • Not Synced
    212
    00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:01,518
    than all of the fish
    that they've seen before.
  • Not Synced
    213
    00:11:01,518 --> 00:11:06,196
    I also think that subconsciously,
    humans, we do sort of do this anyway.
  • Not Synced
    214
    00:11:06,196 --> 00:11:09,613
    We give ourselves a little bit of time
    to play the field,
  • Not Synced
    215
    00:11:09,613 --> 00:11:13,115
    get a feel for the marketplace
    or whatever when we're young.
  • Not Synced
    216
    00:11:13,115 --> 00:11:18,023
    And then we only start looking seriously
    at potential marriage candidates
  • Not Synced
    217
    00:11:18,023 --> 00:11:19,913
    once we hit our mid-to-late 20s.
  • Not Synced
    218
    00:11:19,913 --> 00:11:22,716
    I think this is conclusive proof,
    if ever it were needed,
  • Not Synced
    219
    00:11:22,716 --> 00:11:27,222
    that everybody's brains are prewired
    to be just a little bit mathematical.
  • Not Synced
    220
    00:11:27,616 --> 00:11:29,477
    Okay, so that was Top Tip #2.
  • Not Synced
    221
    00:11:29,477 --> 00:11:32,730
    Now, Top Tip #3: How to avoid divorce.
  • Not Synced
    222
    00:11:32,730 --> 00:11:35,868
    Okay, so let's imagine then
    that you picked your perfect partner
  • Not Synced
    223
    00:11:35,868 --> 00:11:40,645
    and you're settling into
    a lifelong relationship with them.
  • Not Synced
    224
    00:11:40,645 --> 00:11:44,719
    Now, I like to think that everybody
    would ideally like to avoid divorce,
  • Not Synced
    225
    00:11:44,719 --> 00:11:49,085
    apart from, I don't know,
    Piers Morgan's wife, maybe?
  • Not Synced
    226
    00:11:50,185 --> 00:11:52,475
    But it's a sad fact of modern life
  • Not Synced
    227
    00:11:52,475 --> 00:11:56,284
    that 1 in 2 marriages in the
    States ends in divorce,
  • Not Synced
    228
    00:11:56,284 --> 00:11:59,585
    with the rest of the world
    not being far behind.
  • Not Synced
    229
    00:11:59,585 --> 00:12:01,684
    Now, you can be forgiven, perhaps
  • Not Synced
    230
    00:12:01,684 --> 00:12:05,344
    for thinking that the arguments
    that precede a marital breakup
  • Not Synced
    231
    00:12:05,344 --> 00:12:08,877
    are not an ideal candidate
    for mathematical investigation.
  • Not Synced
    232
    00:12:08,877 --> 00:12:10,777
    For one thing, it's very hard to know
  • Not Synced
    233
    00:12:10,777 --> 00:12:13,834
    what you should be measuring
    or what you should be quantifying.
  • Not Synced
    234
    00:12:13,834 --> 00:12:20,407
    But this didn't stop a psychologist,
    John Gottman, who did exactly that.
  • Not Synced
    235
    00:12:20,407 --> 00:12:25,602
    Gottman observed hundreds of couples
    having a conversation
  • Not Synced
    236
    00:12:25,602 --> 00:12:28,064
    and recorded, well,
    everything you can think of.
  • Not Synced
    237
    00:12:28,064 --> 00:12:30,551
    So he recorded what was said
    in the conversation,
  • Not Synced
    238
    00:12:30,551 --> 00:12:32,614
    he recorded their skin conductivity,
  • Not Synced
    239
    00:12:32,614 --> 00:12:34,534
    he recorded their facial expressions,
  • Not Synced
    240
    00:12:34,534 --> 00:12:36,874
    their heart rates, their blood pressure,
  • Not Synced
    241
    00:12:36,874 --> 00:12:43,324
    basically everything apart from whether
    or not the wife was actually always right,
  • Not Synced
    242
    00:12:43,324 --> 00:12:46,348
    which incidentally she totally is.
  • Not Synced
    243
    00:12:46,348 --> 00:12:49,268
    But what Gottman and his team found
  • Not Synced
    244
    00:12:49,268 --> 00:12:51,772
    was that one of the
    most important predictors
  • Not Synced
    245
    00:12:51,772 --> 00:12:53,922
    for whether or not a couple
    is going to get divorced
  • Not Synced
    246
    00:12:53,922 --> 00:12:59,022
    was how positive or negative each
    partner was being in the conversation.
  • Not Synced
    247
    00:12:59,022 --> 00:13:01,634
    Now, couples that were very low-risk
  • Not Synced
    248
    00:13:01,634 --> 00:13:05,861
    scored a lot more positive points
    on Gottman's scale than negative.
  • Not Synced
    249
    00:13:05,861 --> 00:13:08,001
    Whereas bad relationships,
  • Not Synced
    250
    00:13:08,001 --> 00:13:10,793
    by which I mean, probably
    going to get divorced,
  • Not Synced
    251
    00:13:10,793 --> 00:13:15,405
    they found themselves getting
    into a spiral of negativity.
  • Not Synced
    252
    00:13:15,405 --> 00:13:17,758
    Now just by using these very simple ideas,
  • Not Synced
    253
    00:13:17,758 --> 00:13:20,260
    Gottman and his group were able to predict
  • Not Synced
    254
    00:13:20,260 --> 00:13:23,103
    whether a given couple
    was going to get divorced
  • Not Synced
    255
    00:13:23,103 --> 00:13:25,758
    with a 90 percent accuracy.
  • Not Synced
    256
    00:13:25,758 --> 00:13:29,152
    But it wasn't until he teamed up
    with a mathematician, James Murray,
  • Not Synced
    257
    00:13:29,152 --> 00:13:31,291
    that they really started to understand
  • Not Synced
    258
    00:13:31,291 --> 00:13:35,601
    what causes these negativity spirals
    and how they occur.
  • Not Synced
    259
    00:13:35,601 --> 00:13:37,308
    And the results that they found
  • Not Synced
    260
    00:13:37,308 --> 00:13:41,667
    I think are just incredibly
    impressively simple and interesting.
  • Not Synced
    261
    00:13:41,667 --> 00:13:46,005
    So these equations, they predict how
    the wife or husband is going to respond
  • Not Synced
    262
    00:13:46,005 --> 00:13:47,971
    in their next turn of the conversation,
  • Not Synced
    263
    00:13:47,971 --> 00:13:50,099
    how positive or negative
    they're going to be.
  • Not Synced
    264
    00:13:50,099 --> 00:13:51,896
    And these equations, they depend on
  • Not Synced
    265
    00:13:51,896 --> 00:13:54,242
    the mood of the person
    when they're on their own,
  • Not Synced
    266
    00:13:54,242 --> 00:13:56,856
    the mood of the person when
    they're with their partner,
  • Not Synced
    267
    00:13:56,856 --> 00:13:58,845
    but most importantly, they depend on
  • Not Synced
    268
    00:13:58,845 --> 00:14:01,824
    how much the husband and wife
    influence one another.
  • Not Synced
    269
    00:14:01,824 --> 00:14:04,532
    Now, I think it's important
    to point out at this stage,
  • Not Synced
    270
    00:14:04,532 --> 00:14:07,852
    that these exact equations
    have also been shown
  • Not Synced
    271
    00:14:07,852 --> 00:14:10,498
    to be perfectly able at describing
  • Not Synced
    272
    00:14:10,498 --> 00:14:14,256
    what happens between two
    countries in an arms race.
  • Not Synced
    273
    00:14:14,256 --> 00:14:16,394
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    274
    00:14:18,194 --> 00:14:21,905
    So that -- an arguing couple
    spiraling into negativity
  • Not Synced
    275
    00:14:21,905 --> 00:14:23,819
    and teetering on the brink of divorce --
  • Not Synced
    276
    00:14:23,819 --> 00:14:28,107
    is actually mathematically equivalent to
    the beginning of a nuclear war.
  • Not Synced
    277
    00:14:28,107 --> 00:14:30,606
    (Laughter)
  • Not Synced
    278
    00:14:30,606 --> 00:14:33,159
    But the really important term
    in this equation
  • Not Synced
    279
    00:14:33,159 --> 00:14:35,877
    is the influence that people
    have on one another,
  • Not Synced
    280
    00:14:35,877 --> 00:14:38,900
    and in particular, something called
    the negativity threshhold.
  • Not Synced
    281
    00:14:38,900 --> 00:14:40,579
    Now, the negativity threshold,
  • Not Synced
    282
    00:14:40,579 --> 00:14:45,072
    you can think of as
    how annoying the husband can be
  • Not Synced
    283
    00:14:45,072 --> 00:14:49,254
    before the wife starts to get
    really pissed off, and vice versa.
  • Not Synced
    284
    00:14:49,254 --> 00:14:54,408
    Now, I always thought that good marriages
    were about compromise and understanding
  • Not Synced
    285
    00:14:54,408 --> 00:14:57,261
    and allowing the person to
    have the space to be themselves.
  • Not Synced
    286
    00:14:57,261 --> 00:15:00,558
    So I would have thought that perhaps
    the most successful relationships
  • Not Synced
    287
    00:15:00,558 --> 00:15:04,024
    were ones where there was
    a really high negativity threshold.
  • Not Synced
    288
    00:15:04,024 --> 00:15:05,692
    Where couples let things go
  • Not Synced
    289
    00:15:05,692 --> 00:15:08,487
    and only brought things up if
    they really were a big deal.
  • Not Synced
    290
    00:15:08,487 --> 00:15:12,023
    But actually, the mathematics
    and subsequent findings by the team
  • Not Synced
    291
    00:15:12,023 --> 00:15:15,318
    have shown the exact opposite is true.
  • Not Synced
    292
    00:15:15,318 --> 00:15:17,707
    The best couples,
    or the most successful couples,
  • Not Synced
    293
    00:15:17,707 --> 00:15:21,519
    are the ones with a really low
    negativity threshold.
  • Not Synced
    294
    00:15:21,519 --> 00:15:25,378
    These are the couples that don't
    let anything go unnoticed
  • Not Synced
    295
    00:15:25,378 --> 00:15:28,399
    and allow each other
    some room to complain.
  • Not Synced
    296
    00:15:28,399 --> 00:15:33,733
    These are the couples that are continually
    trying to repair their own relationship,
  • Not Synced
    297
    00:15:33,733 --> 00:15:36,418
    that have a much more positive
    outlook on their marriage.
  • Not Synced
    298
    00:15:36,418 --> 00:15:38,516
    Couples that don't let things go
  • Not Synced
    299
    00:15:38,516 --> 00:15:44,426
    and couples that don't let trivial things
    end up being a really big deal.
  • Not Synced
    300
    00:15:44,426 --> 00:15:50,023
    Now of course, it takes bit more than
    just a low negativity threshold
  • Not Synced
    301
    00:15:50,023 --> 00:15:54,162
    and not compromising to
    have a successful relationship.
  • Not Synced
    302
    00:15:54,162 --> 00:15:56,650
    But I think that it's quite interesting
  • Not Synced
    303
    00:15:56,650 --> 00:15:59,053
    to know that there is really
    mathematical evidence
  • Not Synced
    304
    00:15:59,053 --> 00:16:02,480
    to say that you should never
    let the sun go down on your anger.
  • Not Synced
    305
    00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:04,188
    So those are my top three tips
  • Not Synced
    306
    00:16:04,188 --> 00:16:07,383
    of how maths can help you
    with love and relationships.
  • Not Synced
    307
    00:16:07,383 --> 00:16:09,826
    But I hope
    that aside from their use as tips,
  • Not Synced
    308
    00:16:09,826 --> 00:16:13,928
    they also give you a little bit of insight
    into the power of mathematics.
  • Not Synced
    309
    00:16:13,928 --> 00:16:18,293
    Because for me, equations
    and symbols aren't just a thing.
  • Not Synced
    310
    00:16:18,293 --> 00:16:23,119
    They're a voice that speaks out
    about the incredible richness of nature
  • Not Synced
    311
    00:16:23,119 --> 00:16:24,929
    and the startling simplicity
  • Not Synced
    312
    00:16:24,929 --> 00:16:29,384
    in the patterns that twist and turn
    and warp and evolve all around us,
  • Not Synced
    313
    00:16:29,384 --> 00:16:32,187
    from how the world works to how we behave.
  • Not Synced
    314
    00:16:32,187 --> 00:16:34,485
    So I hope that perhaps,
    for just a couple of you,
  • Not Synced
    315
    00:16:34,485 --> 00:16:36,926
    a little bit of insight into
    the mathematics of love
  • Not Synced
    316
    00:16:36,926 --> 00:16:40,134
    can persuade you to have
    a little bit more love for mathematics.
  • Not Synced
    317
    00:16:40,134 --> 00:16:41,521
    Thank you.
  • Not Synced
    318
    00:16:41,521 --> 00:16:43,815
    (Applause)
Title:
Matematika ljubavi
Speaker:
Hannah Fry
Description:

more » « less
Video Language:
English
Team:
closed TED
Project:
TEDTalks
Duration:
16:56
Retired user edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Katarina Smetko edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Katarina Smetko edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Katarina Smetko edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Katarina Smetko approved Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Retired user accepted Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Retired user edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Retired user edited Croatian subtitles for The mathematics of love
Show all

Croatian subtitles

Revisions Compare revisions