1
00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:05,930
Art...
2
00:00:05,930 --> 00:00:07,900
ArtSleuth
3
00:00:10,660 --> 00:00:13,400
A shower of roses
4
00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:17,000
A modestly concealing gesture
5
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:19,860
A pensive face
6
00:00:19,860 --> 00:00:23,060
A picture by Sandro Botticelli.
7
00:00:23,060 --> 00:00:27,000
One of those mythical nudes which recur throughout the history of painting?
8
00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,000
Not just that:
9
00:00:29,660 --> 00:00:33,130
a nude of a kind not seen for a millennium:
10
00:00:33,130 --> 00:00:37,730
life-size, graceful, full-frontal and totally present.
11
00:00:37,730 --> 00:00:39,850
For centuries, nudity has spelt humiliation,
12
00:00:39,850 --> 00:00:41,850
… or vice
13
00:00:41,850 --> 00:00:43,850
and beauty has been suspect,
14
00:00:45,100 --> 00:00:49,600
and now both are revealed and idolised in this picture of Venus, Godess of Love…
15
00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:53,300
With this celebration of woman’s body and grace,
16
00:00:53,300 --> 00:00:57,900
humanist man of the Renaissance enters the modern age.
17
00:00:57,900 --> 00:00:59,350
Icon?
18
00:00:59,350 --> 00:01:01,350
… or cliché?
19
00:01:02,450 --> 00:01:06,100
Countless reproductions have made this scene so sickeningly familiar,
20
00:01:06,100 --> 00:01:08,500
that we almost hope to see it take a Monty Python turn,
21
00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:13,250
and forget to look at it properly!
22
00:01:13,250 --> 00:01:16,600
If we did, and looked beyond its apparent serenity and gentleness,
23
00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:18,600
this uneasy balancing act,
24
00:01:20,850 --> 00:01:24,250
this frenetic movement,
25
00:01:24,250 --> 00:01:26,250
this firm, unwavering line…
26
00:01:29,250 --> 00:01:31,500
… we would see that this slender, elongated figure,
27
00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:33,500
with its abundant hair
28
00:01:33,500 --> 00:01:35,900
is light years away from the massive solidity of classical statuary…
29
00:01:35,900 --> 00:01:38,900
and that this abstracted, melancholy face,
30
00:01:38,900 --> 00:01:42,850
is closer to today’s deadpan super-models
31
00:01:42,850 --> 00:01:44,850
than the frankly carnal images of Venus which followed it.
32
00:01:46,200 --> 00:01:51,400
So: Renaissance goddess or medieval madonna?
33
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:56,650
Symbol of emancipation or stock masculine ideal?
34
00:01:56,650 --> 00:01:58,650
Who exactly is this woman?
35
00:01:58,650 --> 00:02:00,650
BOTTICELLI - *The Birth of Venus*
36
00:02:00,650 --> 00:02:02,650
*That Obscure Object of Desire*
37
00:02:04,550 --> 00:02:06,550
Part 1 : Weight of the word, shock of the image
38
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:09,000
The answer seems obvious:
39
00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:11,900
she is Venus, at the very moment of her birth!
40
00:02:11,900 --> 00:02:13,000
beautiful …
41
00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:15,000
… awkwardly shielding her nakedness
42
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,000
… surrounded by her attributes:
43
00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,400
the conch-shell, on which she was born amid the waves,
44
00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:21,050
and the roses
45
00:02:26,500 --> 00:02:29,450
On her left, Zephyr, god of the west wind,
46
00:02:29,450 --> 00:02:31,500
cheeks swelling as he blows,
47
00:02:31,500 --> 00:02:34,650
and his companion, Aura, the spring wind.
48
00:02:34,650 --> 00:02:37,750
They are wafting the shell towards the shore …
49
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,050
… where a woman is waiting to fold Venus in a scarlet cloak,
50
00:02:42,050 --> 00:02:44,050
patterned with violets.
51
00:02:44,700 --> 00:02:46,250
She is one of the Horae,
52
00:02:46,250 --> 00:02:49,100
goddesses of the seasons - presumably Spring.
53
00:02:49,850 --> 00:02:54,600
But Botticelli’s Venus comes straight from classical antiquity:
54
00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:59,400
True, he has faithfully followed the description of her birth given by Politian,
55
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:01,700
his contemporary.
56
00:03:01,700 --> 00:03:04,750
But that text is itself based
on Pliny the Elder’s account of
57
00:03:04,750 --> 00:03:08,400
a legendary fresco of Venus, painted by Apelles,
58
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:10,900
ancient Greece’s most celebrated painter,
59
00:03:12,250 --> 00:03:13,800
for Alexander the Great!
60
00:03:15,750 --> 00:03:20,050
Impossible to find a more illustrious forebear for the artist,
61
00:03:20,050 --> 00:03:23,150
or his patrons, the Medici.
62
00:03:23,150 --> 00:03:27,250
And the Medici themselves provide his second great source of classical inspiration -
63
00:03:27,250 --> 00:03:30,150
their Roman copy of the Venus of Praxiteles,
64
00:03:30,150 --> 00:03:34,650
a nude statue whose fabled beauty so fired one young man with passion
65
00:03:34,650 --> 00:03:37,150
that he attempted to make love to it!
66
00:03:38,900 --> 00:03:43,500
The Birth of Venus thus seems to embody the true Renaissance spirit:
67
00:03:43,500 --> 00:03:46,600
rejection of medieval obscurantism
68
00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:48,600
thanks to rediscovery of the Greek and Roman legacy.
69
00:03:50,350 --> 00:03:56,650
And yet, comparison of Botticelli’s picture with other contemporary masterworks
70
00:03:56,650 --> 00:03:58,650
reveals some striking differences:
71
00:03:59,550 --> 00:04:02,950
His fellow painters are enthralled by perspective,
72
00:04:02,950 --> 00:04:04,950
but his use of it here is perfunctory:
73
00:04:06,850 --> 00:04:11,150
no progressive fading-out of contrasts to convey increasing distance
74
00:04:11,150 --> 00:04:15,700
and his figures look like cut-outs pasted on a background.
75
00:04:17,050 --> 00:04:20,950
Again, while his contemporaries seek to make figures life-like
76
00:04:20,950 --> 00:04:22,950
by softening their contours,
77
00:04:22,950 --> 00:04:25,750
Botticelli gives those contours a chiselled clarity.
78
00:04:28,250 --> 00:04:31,050
Finally, Venus differs from her model:
79
00:04:31,050 --> 00:04:33,900
her neck and face are longer
80
00:04:33,900 --> 00:04:35,350
her shoulders less broad
81
00:04:35,350 --> 00:04:37,350
her stomach rounder…
82
00:04:38,450 --> 00:04:42,900
and she violates the sacrosanct principles of classical proportion…
83
00:04:42,900 --> 00:04:47,900
In theory, the proportions of the whole are determined by the distance between the breasts,
84
00:04:47,900 --> 00:04:49,900
but here the rule is loosely applied and the proportional distances are variable.
85
00:04:52,250 --> 00:04:54,500
Classical stability has gone too:
86
00:04:54,500 --> 00:04:57,600
instead, we get an improbable disequilibrium.
87
00:04:58,350 --> 00:05:01,700
Is Venus concealing her real origins?
88
00:05:05,830 --> 00:05:07,500
Part 2. *The art of living in the present*
89
00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:12,150
With the scanty classical material at his disposal,
90
00:05:12,150 --> 00:05:15,400
Botticelli cannot hope to convey the goddess’s full beauty to his contemporaries.
91
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:22,100
So he falls back on earlier styles still popular in late fifteenth-century Florence.
92
00:05:22,100 --> 00:05:26,600
He turns, for example, to the medieval tapestries of northern Europe, which are highly prized by the Medici.
93
00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:29,350
Typically, their figures stand out like arabesques,
94
00:05:29,350 --> 00:05:33,000
and his flattened perspective in The Birth of Venus echoes this medium,
95
00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:37,850
whose physical nature makes it hard to render depth.
96
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:42,200
He also turns to goldsmithing, a typically medieval art,
97
00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:44,200
now on the way out.
98
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:48,750
Botticelli himself trained first as a goldsmith,
99
00:05:48,750 --> 00:05:52,100
which explains the crystalline precision of his draughtsmanship
100
00:05:52,750 --> 00:05:55,450
and why “virile” is the epithet commonly applied to him.
101
00:05:56,400 --> 00:06:00,300
In fifteenth-century usage, “virility” denoted absolute mastery of an art or skill
102
00:06:00,300 --> 00:06:02,800
- what we now call virtuosity
103
00:06:03,300 --> 00:06:07,600
which, for a Florentine painter in 1485, meant flawless draughtsmanship,
104
00:06:08,750 --> 00:06:10,750
a field in which Botticelli reigned supreme!
105
00:06:13,700 --> 00:06:16,850
Ultimately, his naked goddess is not classical, but gothic
106
00:06:18,050 --> 00:06:19,750
- the hair is long
107
00:06:21,500 --> 00:06:23,000
the body is longer
108
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,700
the muscles have gone and the hips are broader
109
00:06:25,700 --> 00:06:27,700
the breasts are smaller
110
00:06:28,500 --> 00:06:30,750
So, is Venus a neo-medieval nude?
111
00:06:32,700 --> 00:06:35,950
In form yes, but by no means in subject:
112
00:06:37,450 --> 00:06:40,950
medieval artists used the nude in two contexts only, both of them biblical:
113
00:06:40,950 --> 00:06:43,600
sometimes, to symbolise innocence,
114
00:06:44,850 --> 00:06:48,900
but usually, to symbolise sin.
115
00:06:49,650 --> 00:06:54,500
This Venus might be an up-dated version of the nude who stands for innocence and purity,
116
00:06:54,500 --> 00:06:56,500
with gestures expressive of modesty.
117
00:06:58,150 --> 00:07:00,400
her absorbed and pensive face
118
00:07:01,450 --> 00:07:03,900
- the face indeed of the Virgin Mary,
119
00:07:03,900 --> 00:07:05,900
goddess of the Christians!
120
00:07:06,950 --> 00:07:10,100
And the greatest philosophers of the age endow her with virtues:
121
00:07:10,100 --> 00:07:12,100
Temperance and decorum ...
122
00:07:12,100 --> 00:07:14,100
charm and splendour!
123
00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:22,300
This is all part of a strange attempt to reconcile the Catholic religion with the pagan gods of antiquity
124
00:07:23,700 --> 00:07:26,250
earnest treatises are devoted to astrology,
125
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,100
and a full-scale cult of Venus develops.
126
00:07:33,750 --> 00:07:36,400
Mothers who have just given birth are presented with decorated trays,
127
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:38,400
on which the sovereign goddess is shown holding men in thrall,
128
00:07:38,950 --> 00:07:40,950
as if hypnotised.
129
00:07:46,500 --> 00:07:50,100
Supposedly a wedding present, *The Birth of Venus *
130
00:07:50,100 --> 00:07:53,450
might thus be an open and superlative version of the nudes
131
00:07:53,450 --> 00:07:56,150
traditionally painted inside marriage chests.
132
00:07:56,450 --> 00:07:58,750
which were thought to bring good fortune to newlyweds,
133
00:07:58,750 --> 00:08:00,250
excite their desire
134
00:08:00,250 --> 00:08:03,900
and even help to make their future children beautiful!
135
00:08:05,500 --> 00:08:09,650
The picture itself packs a powerfully sensual punch:
136
00:08:09,950 --> 00:08:14,350
The improbably entwined legs of the “lascivious zephyrs”
137
00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:21,950
The long and wildly tossing hair
138
00:08:26,500 --> 00:08:31,350
The wind-blown dress which clings suggestively to the Hora’s body
139
00:08:35,250 --> 00:08:38,200
Indeed, agitation and movement dominate the picture!
140
00:08:38,450 --> 00:08:40,820
And movement is becoming one of the Renaissance artists’
141
00:08:40,820 --> 00:08:43,220
favourite ways of expressing rapture,
142
00:08:43,220 --> 00:08:44,320
Ecstasy-
143
00:08:44,320 --> 00:08:46,320
and sensuality.
144
00:08:48,270 --> 00:08:53,650
Botticelli, after all, could desexualise nudes - when he chose to:
145
00:08:53,650 --> 00:08:56,920
Take the figure of *Truth *- sallow, stiff and flat-chested
146
00:08:56,920 --> 00:08:58,920
- who appears in his *Calumny of Apelles *
147
00:08:59,150 --> 00:09:03,150
• Or this hunch-backed *St. Zenobia, *with her near-male torso.
148
00:09:05,370 --> 00:09:10,070
Neither classical nor medieval, this scene is typical of the Florentine renaissance,
149
00:09:10,070 --> 00:09:12,520
always prompt to sing the pleasures of life and the senses
150
00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:14,300
-even when this involves cheerfully combining…
151
00:09:14,300 --> 00:09:17,370
Christian religion and pagan superstition,
152
00:09:17,370 --> 00:09:20,170
idealisation and carnal sensuality.
153
00:09:21,270 --> 00:09:23,620
And yet, a bare ten years later,
154
00:09:23,620 --> 00:09:26,950
the picture had already been forgotten - and it stayed forgotten for over three centuries!
155
00:09:28,730 --> 00:09:30,400
Part 3 : The double life of Venus
156
00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:34,870
In 1494, ...
157
00:09:35,270 --> 00:09:38,720
Florence abruptly becomes a “theocratic dictatorship”,
158
00:09:38,900 --> 00:09:41,670
led by the Dominican preacher, Savonarola,
159
00:09:41,670 --> 00:09:43,970
who reviles pagan nudity.
160
00:09:44,650 --> 00:09:47,470
Botticelli does formal *penance, *
161
00:09:47,470 --> 00:09:49,470
and goes back to painting biblical scenes.
162
00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:52,570
Venus escapes destruction…
163
00:09:52,570 --> 00:09:55,620
but not Botticelli’s fading popularity in his own lifetime,
164
00:09:55,620 --> 00:09:59,520
the last ten years of which pass without a single commission.
165
00:10:01,100 --> 00:10:02,570
The painters who count now
166
00:10:02,570 --> 00:10:06,570
are the ones who break completely with the medieval style…
167
00:10:06,570 --> 00:10:10,650
and give the human body volume and ultra-realistic, continuous contours.
168
00:10:11,970 --> 00:10:15,450
The daring features of *The Birth of Venus *are soon dismissed as old-fashioned :
169
00:10:16,300 --> 00:10:18,720
and flesh tones are rendered with incredible realism.
170
00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:23,950
The goddess can now go on open display
171
00:10:23,950 --> 00:10:25,950
in noblemen’s houses,
172
00:10:25,950 --> 00:10:27,950
and even look back boldly at viewers!
173
00:10:29,770 --> 00:10:32,050
As time goes on, she becomes steadily heavier,
174
00:10:34,050 --> 00:10:36,620
posing suggestively,
175
00:10:36,620 --> 00:10:37,900
laden with jewels...
176
00:10:37,900 --> 00:10:40,950
- and sometimes more courtesan than goddess.
177
00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:44,720
Botticelli’s vision is a thing of the past,
178
00:10:44,720 --> 00:10:48,720
and only makes a comeback in the nineteenth century,
179
00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:51,720
which, as we know, is schizophrenic:
180
00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:54,220
Never have so many female nudes been painted…
181
00:10:54,220 --> 00:10:57,750
... while people insistently proclaim that this is art,
182
00:10:57,750 --> 00:10:59,750
and must be viewed dispassionately
183
00:11:00,420 --> 00:11:06,150
“*with the purity of little children, who play naked together with no sense of shame”*
184
00:11:06,620 --> 00:11:10,370
The female body must remain chaste, without sexual connotations …
185
00:11:10,370 --> 00:11:14,450
while desire is transferred to the other figures in the picture.
186
00:11:14,870 --> 00:11:16,450
The effects of all this are disastrous:
187
00:11:18,100 --> 00:11:20,250
the resulting scenes become farcical,
188
00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:23,070
while rolling eyes,
189
00:11:23,070 --> 00:11:25,520
and swivelling hips
190
00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:28,870
constantly remind us that these “sexless” nudes
191
00:11:28,870 --> 00:11:32,970
are seething cauldrons of repressed sensuality, likely to boil over from one moment to the next!
192
00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:38,320
Enough is enough!
193
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:40,220
A group of English artists and intellectuals
194
00:11:40,220 --> 00:11:42,870
attempt to find out where the trouble really started -
195
00:11:43,850 --> 00:11:46,070
and trace the problem back to Raphael,
196
00:11:46,070 --> 00:11:48,950
whose contempt for simplicity and truth,
197
00:11:48,950 --> 00:11:51,150
and taste for pompous, artificial poses
198
00:11:51,150 --> 00:11:53,150
they roundly denounce.
199
00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:59,220
Having settled scores with Raphael, they enthusiastically rediscover the *quattrocento *- particularly Botticelli! -
200
00:11:59,220 --> 00:12:01,220
and the sweet simplicity of his scenes
201
00:12:02,270 --> 00:12:03,820
bodies
202
00:12:04,500 --> 00:12:06,470
restrained gestures
203
00:12:06,970 --> 00:12:10,020
and melancholy, introspective faces.
204
00:12:11,250 --> 00:12:14,620
For them, this hesitant, shy Venus
205
00:12:14,620 --> 00:12:17,300
is beautiful because she inspires, not desire,
206
00:12:17,300 --> 00:12:19,300
but tenderness.
207
00:12:19,300 --> 00:12:21,820
By the end of the century, the matter is settled:
208
00:12:21,820 --> 00:12:25,520
reproductions of The Birth of Venus take British homes by storm,
209
00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:29,400
and Victorian England welcomes her as the acceptable face of sex:
210
00:12:29,670 --> 00:12:31,600
a woman who combines surpassing grace
211
00:12:31,850 --> 00:12:34,870
with the restraint on which decency depends.
212
00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:38,620
This is where the goddess’s last transformation starts:
213
00:12:38,620 --> 00:12:41,770
a woman with a figure men might dream of,
214
00:12:41,770 --> 00:12:43,770
who also seems blissfully unthinking.
215
00:12:44,420 --> 00:12:48,620
If Venus again excites desire, she now does so as a sex object,
216
00:12:48,620 --> 00:12:51,600
whose only function is to feed male fantasies.
217
00:12:52,300 --> 00:12:55,670
Alain Jacquet is not simply basing a visual pun on cockle shell and oil company,
218
00:12:55,670 --> 00:12:59,070
when he turns her into a petrol pump.
219
00:13:00,370 --> 00:13:03,250
He is also implying that she is now a utilitarian object,
220
00:13:03,250 --> 00:13:05,370
and that satisfying male desire is her purpose.
221
00:13:09,800 --> 00:13:11,770
And so, to understand who she really is,
222
00:13:11,770 --> 00:13:14,070
we need to look beyond cliché and context,
223
00:13:14,070 --> 00:13:16,070
and follow her
224
00:13:17,050 --> 00:13:19,000
back to her origins.
225
00:13:19,450 --> 00:13:24,550
If we do that, we may at last understand and feel the full seductive power of a picture
226
00:13:24,550 --> 00:13:27,300
which gives us a universal vision of perfect beauty
227
00:13:27,300 --> 00:13:31,150
- and which celebrates birth and life itself as well.
228
00:13:32,930 --> 00:13:35,600
Next episode: Marie-Antoinette and her children by Vigée-Lebrun
229
00:13:35,750 --> 00:13:38,230
A PR exercise?
230
00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:44,200
Find more informations on: www.canal-educatif.fr
231
00:13:45,100 --> 00:13:48,100
Written & directed by
232
00:13:48,100 --> 00:13:51,100
Produced by:
233
00:13:51,100 --> 00:13:54,110
Scientific advisor:
234
00:13:54,110 --> 00:13:57,100
This film was made possible thanks to the support of sponsors (including you?) and of the French Ministry of Culture
235
00:13:57,100 --> 00:14:00,100
Voiceover
236
00:14:00,100 --> 00:14:03,100
Editing and motion effects:
237
00:14:03,100 --> 00:14:06,110
Postproduction and sound recording:
238
00:14:06,110 --> 00:14:09,100
Musical selection:
239
00:14:09,100 --> 00:14:12,100
Music
240
00:14:12,100 --> 00:14:15,100
Special thanks
English subtitles: Vincent Nash
241
00:14:15,100 --> 00:14:18,090
Photographic credits
242
00:14:18,100 --> 00:14:18,100
Un production CED