0:00:01.533,0:00:08.133
Based on the data below which student's score improved the most between the mid-term and final exam?

0:00:08.133,0:00:17.067
And so they give us this data in terms of a bar graph for each student.We actually have two bars that show the mid-term in blue and then final exam in red.

0:00:17.067,0:00:21.000
and they tell us that here,mid-term in blue,and final exam(in red)

0:00:21.000,0:00:25.400
-and sometimes this is called a two column bar graph,because for each student here,you have two columns

0:00:25.400,0:00:31.000
of data.So if you were to actually look at the data its self,you have the mid-term data and then the final

0:00:31.000,0:00:35.533
exam data.Now,they are asking us,"which student's score improved the most

0:00:35.533,0:00:43.133
between the mid-term and the final exams?"So,if we look at Jasmin right over here,might as well start with her since she

0:00:43.133,0:00:44.800
might as well start with her since she

0:00:44.800,0:00:47.933
is the most to the left.It looks like she definitely did improve from the mid-term to the final

0:00:47.933,0:00:50.667
It looks like the mid-term,if I had to guess,this looks like about

0:00:50.667,0:00:56.200
a,I don't know,looks like she got maybe a 72 or 73 on the mid-term,I'm just guessing.

0:00:56.200,0:01:00.133
I don't know the exact number.And looks like on the final she got,I don't know

0:01:00.133,0:01:04.533
that looks like maybe a 77 or 78,approximately.So she improved a little bit about

0:01:04.533,0:01:09.000
5 points from the mid-term to the final.The way they have given us this information

0:01:09.000,0:01:12.067
we don't know the exact numbers, because it isn't super precise

0:01:12.067,0:01:13.933
in terms of marking off the bars.

0:01:13.933,0:01:16.333
Hopefully it will become obvious when we look through everyone's scores

0:01:16.333,0:01:18.467
Lets look at Jeff.

0:01:18.467,0:01:21.733
Jeff actually did WORSE from the mid-term to the final exam.

0:01:21.733,0:01:26.400
Looks like he got over an 85 on the mid-term,and then on the final

0:01:26.400,0:01:29.200
looks like he got,about an 84 or 85.

0:01:29.200,0:01:30.733
So he actually went down.

0:01:30.733,0:01:33.733
So it is definately not Jeff.he definately did not improve the most

0:01:33.733,0:01:34.867
he actually went down.

0:01:34.867,0:01:36.800
Next,if you think about Nevin,

0:01:36.800,0:01:40.333
it looks like Nevin actually improved about the same ammount

0:01:40.333,0:01:45.800
as Jasmin.On both scores-I don't know if Nevin is a boy or a girl's name,

0:01:45.800,0:01:49.467
this person on both tests,this person did better than Jasmin.

0:01:49.467,0:01:51.533
But looks like the ACTUAL improvement is about the same.

0:01:51.533,0:01:56.000
Looks like they went from about an 83 to,I don't know,about an 88.

0:01:56.000,0:02:01.000
I am just estimating it,just trying to look at,look at this axis right

0:02:01.000,0:02:03.133
over there,and estimating what those scores are.

0:02:03.133,0:02:06.400
So Nevin and Jasmin right now, based on the three we have seen

0:02:06.400,0:02:07.800
are tied for the lead.

0:02:07.800,0:02:09.133
Now lets look at Alejandra.

0:02:09.133,0:02:11.333
Now Alejandra-and this is,ok,this jumps out.

0:02:11.333,0:02:13.800
She definately improved,DRAMATICALLY,

0:02:13.800,0:02:16.533
from the mid-term, to the final exam.

0:02:16.533,0:02:19.400
Looks like on the mid-term,she maybe got an 81 or an 82.

0:02:19.450,0:02:22.467
So maybe this was an 82 she got on the mid-term,

0:02:22.467,0:02:26.933
and then on the final,looks like she got about a 95,a 95 on the final.

0:02:26.933,0:02:28.467
So this dramatic improvement.

0:02:28.467,0:02:31.333
So right now,Alejandra is the leading contender

0:02:31.333,0:02:34.733
for most improved,from the mid-term,to the final.

0:02:34.733,0:02:36.867
And then,finally, Marta,

0:02:36.867,0:02:37.800
right over here,

0:02:37.800,0:02:42.067
looks like,she actually got worse from the mid-term to the final.

0:02:42.067,0:02:44.400
She scored in the mid 90's on the mid-term,

0:02:44.400,0:02:45.933
and then LOW 90's in the final.

0:02:45.933,0:02:47.933
So she is definately not the most improved.

0:02:47.933,0:02:50.400
So the winner here is Alejandra.

0:02:50.400,0:02:54.400
Alejandra,is the most improved

0:02:54.400,0:02:57.800
between the mid-term,and the final exam.