0:00:01.080,0:00:06.320
Did any of you translate Erin McKean's talk? For those who haven't, here's a small extract.

0:00:06.320,0:00:10.160
'Lexicographical' is the same pattern as higgeldy piggeldy.

0:00:10.160,0:00:12.360
Right? It’s a fun word to say, and I get to say it a lot.

0:00:12.360,0:00:17.080
I would add to that: higgeldy-piggeldy is also a fun word to translate.

0:00:17.080,0:00:21.320
In Dutch, I used 'olleke bolleke', as in…

0:00:21.320,0:00:24.000
Olleke bolleke, rubisolleke,

0:00:24.000,0:00:27.240
olleke bolleke, rubisolleke, olleke bolleke, knol!

0:00:27.240,0:00:30.880
Luckily, this nursery rhyme is known

0:00:30.880,0:00:33.640
in both of the major regions where Dutch is spoken.

0:00:33.640,0:00:37.600
Dutch is the mother tongue of 23 million people,

0:00:37.600,0:00:40.280
of whom 16 million live in the Netherlands,

0:00:40.280,0:00:44.720
6 million in the Northern part of Belgium, also known as Flanders,

0:00:44.720,0:00:48.480
and 400.000 in Suriname, in South-America.

0:00:48.480,0:00:51.840
We have an official 'Dutch Language Union'.

0:00:51.840,0:00:53.920
So where's the problem?

0:00:53.920,0:00:57.200
Dutch from the Netherlands and Dutch from Flanders

0:00:57.200,0:00:58.880
sound very different.

0:00:58.880,0:01:01.680
If you meet Johan Cruyff in the morning,

0:01:01.680,0:01:06.080
and if you're lucky, he will say 'Goeiemorgen' to you.

0:01:06.080,0:01:09.160
Kim Clijsters will say 'Goeiemorgen'.

0:01:09.160,0:01:12.280
In subtitling, this is of course irrelevant.

0:01:12.280,0:01:15.560
So once again: where's the problem?

0:01:15.560,0:01:18.120
We also use different words.

0:01:18.120,0:01:20.880
A Dutchman will call this a 'klokkromme'.

0:01:20.880,0:01:23.760
In Flanders we call it a 'Gauss-curve'.

0:01:23.760,0:01:28.560
Last but not least, each group has their set of 'typical doubts',

0:01:28.560,0:01:30.920
or deviations from Standard Dutch

0:01:30.920,0:01:33.800
that occur more in one or the other region.

0:01:33.800,0:01:37.720
Over the years, the Dutch have lost their sensitivity

0:01:37.720,0:01:39.520
to the gender of Dutch nouns.

0:01:39.520,0:01:42.840
And so only a Dutchman might wonder

0:01:42.840,0:01:45.040
whether a cow is male or female

0:01:45.040,0:01:47.800
… or so we teasingly say, in Flanders.

0:01:47.800,0:01:51.720
In Belgium, on the other hand, whether we like it or not,

0:01:51.720,0:01:55.920
our language is influenced by our French-speaking fellow countrymen,

0:01:55.920,0:01:59.920
leading to sometimes awkward constructions borrowed from French.

0:01:59.920,0:02:02.760
So there's the problem:

0:02:02.760,0:02:04.760
if a reviewer from the Netherlands

0:02:04.760,0:02:07.320
reviews the work of a colleague from Belgium,

0:02:07.320,0:02:10.000
she might see a text which she herself

0:02:10.000,0:02:12.080
would never have written that way,

0:02:12.080,0:02:13.720
and the other way round.

0:02:13.720,0:02:15.720
If she starts correcting it,

0:02:15.720,0:02:17.840
before she knows it, she will be caught up

0:02:17.840,0:02:19.640
in an endless yes-no-discussion.

0:02:19.640,0:02:22.800
It happened to me in my early TED days.

0:02:22.800,0:02:26.560
I even confess that for my very first translation,

0:02:26.560,0:02:29.840
I made sure I asked a translator from my own country

0:02:29.840,0:02:32.640
to review it, because I felt uncomfortable

0:02:32.640,0:02:34.640
with a review from the 'other side'.

0:02:34.640,0:02:37.120
But I quickly learned that if you stick

0:02:37.120,0:02:39.320
to a limited number of ground rules,

0:02:39.320,0:02:42.200
you can easily overcome this difficulty.

0:02:42.200,0:02:45.520
This is what I want to share with you today.

0:02:45.520,0:02:49.240
The best way to stop discussions about 'who is right',

0:02:49.240,0:02:51.720
is to agree on the standards you use.

0:02:51.720,0:02:53.920
For Dutch, that is quite easy.

0:02:53.920,0:02:56.760
The official thesaurus, the main dictionary

0:02:56.760,0:03:00.520
and the standard grammar are all accessible online.

0:03:00.520,0:03:03.400
All three are widely used and accepted

0:03:03.400,0:03:05.080
in the Netherlands and in Belgium.

0:03:05.080,0:03:07.400
If you indicate from the beginning

0:03:07.400,0:03:09.640
that you will use these as a standard,

0:03:09.640,0:03:12.400
you can avoid a lot of tension and discussion.

0:03:12.400,0:03:14.480
But even if a word 'exists',

0:03:14.480,0:03:16.920
it may be highly unusual in one of the two regions.

0:03:16.920,0:03:19.480
Take the 'klokkromme'.

0:03:19.480,0:03:22.040
It's a word hardly any Belgian would use,

0:03:22.040,0:03:24.760
but on the other hand it is not difficult to understand

0:03:24.760,0:03:27.160
-- especially not in context,

0:03:27.160,0:03:29.480
as is the case in TED Talks.

0:03:29.480,0:03:31.840
There's really no point in replacing it

0:03:31.840,0:03:34.280
with a term that no Dutchman would ever use.

0:03:34.280,0:03:36.280
I much rather treat it

0:03:36.280,0:03:38.400
as a 'word worth spreading'.

0:03:38.400,0:03:41.240
Of course, if the unusual word is difficult

0:03:41.240,0:03:43.520
to understand, the story is different.

0:03:43.520,0:03:44.720
But then again,

0:03:44.720,0:03:47.600
rather than replacing the word with a Flemish one,

0:03:47.600,0:03:50.120
I invite my translation partner

0:03:50.120,0:03:51.360
to look for an alternative

0:03:51.360,0:03:53.840
that is acceptable to both of us.

0:03:53.840,0:03:55.880
I would like to end with a few words

0:03:55.880,0:03:57.480
about what I try to to keep in mind

0:03:57.480,0:03:59.920
when reviewing or translating into Dutch.

0:03:59.920,0:04:03.160
First of all, I keep my audience in mind.

0:04:03.160,0:04:05.880
I am writing for people from different regions.

0:04:05.880,0:04:08.360
I might as well try to step into their shoes

0:04:08.360,0:04:10.280
and avoid words or expressions

0:04:10.280,0:04:12.400
that I know are confusing.

0:04:12.400,0:04:15.280
Secondly, I keep in mind my translation partner,

0:04:15.280,0:04:17.160
especially when reviewing.

0:04:17.160,0:04:18.880
In one of my early reviews,

0:04:18.880,0:04:21.720
I made the mistake of marking the translation as reviewed

0:04:21.720,0:04:24.440
without having contacted my partner.

0:04:24.440,0:04:27.080
After all, I thought I had only

0:04:27.080,0:04:29.680
corrected some obvious mistakes.

0:04:29.680,0:04:32.720
Since then, I always contact the translator

0:04:32.720,0:04:34.040
and invite them to let me know

0:04:34.040,0:04:35.800
whether they agree with my proposals.

0:04:35.800,0:04:39.320
Thirdly, I keep in mind that I translate for TED

0:04:39.320,0:04:40.720
in order to help spreading

0:04:40.720,0:04:43.000
the interesting ideas of the speakers.

0:04:43.000,0:04:45.280
It's not about “winning” discussions

0:04:45.280,0:04:46.360
with other translators,

0:04:46.360,0:04:48.760
it's about working together

0:04:48.760,0:04:50.600
to provide access to TED

0:04:50.600,0:04:52.960
to as large an audience as possible.

0:04:52.960,0:04:56.520
Last year, a TED Translator from the Netherlands

0:04:56.520,0:04:58.560
asked me whether I thought we should

0:04:58.560,0:05:00.440
have separate sets of translations

0:05:00.440,0:05:02.920
for Dutch from the Netherlands and from Belgium.

0:05:02.920,0:05:04.920
I told him that to me

0:05:04.920,0:05:06.400
that made no sense at all,

0:05:06.400,0:05:08.600
since it would only double the effort

0:05:08.600,0:05:10.320
to spread the ideas.

0:05:10.320,0:05:12.480
It did spur me to get better

0:05:12.480,0:05:15.200
at finding common ground across the regions.

0:05:15.200,0:05:17.360
Last but not least, I can tell you

0:05:17.360,0:05:19.200
that translating for TED has been

0:05:19.200,0:05:21.600
an immensely enriching experience to me.

0:05:21.600,0:05:23.760
My closing thoughts are therefore

0:05:23.760,0:05:25.280
for my fellow TED Translators.

0:05:25.280,0:05:27.440
I would have liked to create

0:05:27.440,0:05:29.440
some kind of ‘Hans Rosling’ graph,

0:05:29.440,0:05:30.840
but you will have to do

0:05:30.840,0:05:32.120
with a wordle

0:05:32.120,0:05:33.840
in which the size of the name

0:05:33.840,0:05:36.800
represents the number of times I worked with them.

0:05:36.800,0:05:40.520
I wish all of you an excellent workshop

0:05:40.520,9:59:59.000
and an exciting TED Global 2011.