WEBVTT

00:00:03.580 --> 00:00:06.190
Art...

00:00:06.190 --> 00:00:07.570
ArtSleuth

00:00:09.910 --> 00:00:11.250
A man

00:00:11.250 --> 00:00:13.070
A woman

00:00:13.070 --> 00:00:16.730
A background of lavish greenery

00:00:18.170 --> 00:00:20.340
A painting by Manet

00:00:21.160 --> 00:00:26.590
Our first impression is of an urban Adam and Eve, …

00:00:26.590 --> 00:00:30.290
… or a moment of flirtation in the forest.

00:00:32.060 --> 00:00:33.860
But it all seems wrong

00:00:33.860 --> 00:00:38.240
Instead of being drawn to each other, the couple seem frozen.

00:00:38.240 --> 00:00:44.690
Instead of an earthly paradise or outdoor scene, we get potted plants in a Paris apartment.

00:00:44.690 --> 00:00:47.950
Parts of the picture itself seem merely sketched in.

00:00:51.670 --> 00:00:55.700
Manet appears to be gleefully bent on not giving us what we expect:

00:00:56.870 --> 00:01:00.900
instead of an erotically charged and highly worked image,....

00:01:00.900 --> 00:01:02.900
.... we get a married couple....

00:01:02.900 --> 00:01:05.200
.... with trouble on the way

00:01:06.780 --> 00:01:12.000
So why does Manet take such an interest in this Parisian pair's mixed-up feelings?

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:17.380
"From “sex in the city” to modern painting"

00:01:20.140 --> 00:01:24.500
"*Part 1: Male fantasies*"

00:01:26.870 --> 00:01:31.290
First and foremost, the picture reflects an unbridgeable gap between:

00:01:31.290 --> 00:01:37.070
1) the woman, in front - beautiful, desirable and supremely elegant.

00:01:37.070 --> 00:01:40.100
With her grey jacket and pleated dress,

00:01:40.100 --> 00:01:43.670
she has something of the siren - or the crayfish in its shell.

00:01:43.670 --> 00:01:48.900
The bars at the back of the bench protect her against the indoor “jungle”

00:01:49.880 --> 00:01:53.100
and the urban satyr it shelters.

00:01:53.100 --> 00:02:00.470
2) and the man. Manet does everything to make him a secondary figure, submissive and harmless.

00:02:00.470 --> 00:02:02.030
A caged lion,

00:02:02.030 --> 00:02:03.480
cramped into stooping by the picture frame,

00:02:03.480 --> 00:02:06.580
he implores the sphinx-like woman to look at him.

00:02:07.500 --> 00:02:10.470
His faintly glimmering cigar looks fragile and pathetic

00:02:10.470 --> 00:02:14.390
beside her parasol

00:02:15.900 --> 00:02:19.320
he is, quite simply, outgunned.

00:02:19.320 --> 00:02:21.540
The only consolation, the only hopeful sign

00:02:21.540 --> 00:02:24.620
appears in the centre of the picture, between the two worlds:

00:02:24.620 --> 00:02:29.400
an ungloved hand, which he shyly moves to touch.

00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:34.300
There is also a dynamic progression from left to right.

00:02:37.060 --> 00:02:42.550
On the woman’s side, flowers, delicate foliage and sharp colours.

00:02:42.550 --> 00:02:47.980
On the man’s, darker colours and large, aggressive leaves.

00:02:47.980 --> 00:02:51.940
The colours – blue, white, pink – and form of the ceramic pot mimic those of the woman!

00:02:55.300 --> 00:03:00.350
Beside it, the earthenware pot, bearing Manet’s signature, stands for the man.

00:03:00.780 --> 00:03:05.440
These flowers evoke desire:

00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:09.210
the pink ones are suggestive of the woman’s complexion and lips;

00:03:09.210 --> 00:03:12.470
the irises follow the direction of her gaze;

00:03:12.470 --> 00:03:16.670
the two red roses symbolize passion.

00:03:24.640 --> 00:03:28.170
Seen against the plants in the background, the hand itself becomes a flower.

00:03:28.170 --> 00:03:30.170
The woman, of course, is aware of these connections:

00:03:30.170 --> 00:03:38.330
she uses dress and make-up to imitate nature and enhance her allure.

00:03:38.330 --> 00:03:40.520
But it is frustrated male desire, above all,

00:03:40.520 --> 00:03:46.430
which gives the flowers, curves and hand the erotic power

00:03:46.430 --> 00:03:48.300
of a whole woman ...

00:03:51.760 --> 00:03:55.300
Part 2. "*Sex in the city: a new vision of women*"

00:03:56.670 --> 00:03:58.180
A century earlier,

00:03:58.180 --> 00:04:03.570
Fragonard painted idealised scenes of aristocratic lovers in natural surroundings.

00:04:03.570 --> 00:04:06.930
As in *In the Conservatory*, the woman has roses on her side, …

00:04:06.930 --> 00:04:09.310
… the man the forest on his.

00:04:09.310 --> 00:04:12.400
But the low wall between them is made to be crossed:

00:04:12.400 --> 00:04:15.740
a passionate embrace is sure to follow.

00:04:15.740 --> 00:04:19.400
For Manet, the urbanite, “this is old hat!”:...

00:04:20.800 --> 00:04:23.270
... “Paris and its suburbs - that’s where the action is!”

00:04:25.110 --> 00:04:28.960
In his portrait of fashion house owners, Monsieur and Madame Jules Guillemet,

00:04:28.960 --> 00:04:32.660
Manet is concerned with the new pattern of male/female relations in the city.

00:04:33.900 --> 00:04:37.520
Marriage is often a facade, as it is in Manet’s own family.

00:04:38.530 --> 00:04:41.710
The stiff posture of his father in this portrait points to syphilis,

00:04:41.710 --> 00:04:46.420
the sexually transmitted disease which killed the painter too.

00:04:47.900 --> 00:04:50.500
Nature is not idealised.

00:04:51.610 --> 00:04:54.270
Unlike Monet in this picture of a garden bench,

00:04:54.270 --> 00:04:58.400
Manet eliminates perspective and masks the horizon.

00:04:58.920 --> 00:05:01.070
He also gives us a new image of women.

00:05:01.070 --> 00:05:04.700
In Courbet, women are incomplete beings, who amuse themselves with animals

00:05:04.700 --> 00:05:07.700
while waiting for “the man” to appear.

00:05:08.040 --> 00:05:11.680
In Manet, they exist in their own right.

00:05:12.140 --> 00:05:16.180
They are the ones whom animals obey.

00:05:24.970 --> 00:05:31.360
And men, when they appear, are often backgrounded, forgotten and held at a distance...

00:05:31.360 --> 00:05:35.260
When women are partly concealed, on the other hand,

00:05:35.260 --> 00:05:41.410
the essential message is that snatched glimpses of a leg or an arm are all the male can hope for.

00:05:41.410 --> 00:05:45.670
And so Madame Guillemet is one of the women who interest Manet:

00:05:46.470 --> 00:05:49.640
she has the independence, the inner certainty

00:05:49.640 --> 00:05:53.650
that go with her status as a fashion tycoon.

00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:01.650
"*Part 3. From women to modern painting*"

00:06:02.350 --> 00:06:04.810
In his pictures of women, Manet invents a new kind of art

00:06:04.810 --> 00:06:10.190
which plays with the viewer’s expectations and wishes.

00:06:10.910 --> 00:06:16.400
In <i>Boating</i> and <i>Nana</i>, we remain outside the picture,

00:06:16.400 --> 00:06:21.110
but, by their looks, .... the man warns us that we are intruding, ....

00:06:21.110 --> 00:06:27.550
.... and the actress calls attention to her current suitor.

00:06:28.590 --> 00:06:31.180
In *the Conservatory<i> and </i>The Bar at the Folies Bergères* are both pictures

00:06:31.180 --> 00:06:35.180
which we enter, as if tumbling into a mirror:

00:06:35.180 --> 00:06:37.840
Madame Guillemet ignores us, just as she ignores her husband

00:06:37.840 --> 00:06:42.990
- and so he and we become doubles, linked by the same fascination.

00:06:43.620 --> 00:06:47.480
In *The Bar*, a man is reflected in the mirror behind the woman.

00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:53.150
But the reflection is ours - caught in the act as would-be seducers.

00:06:53.150 --> 00:06:55.990
And the woman gives us the same impassive look

00:06:55.990 --> 00:07:01.280
that Manet’s painting seems to give its viewers.

00:07:01.280 --> 00:07:06.510
Unlike conventional paintings, which try to make us forget the flat surface of the canvas by modelling the figures…

00:07:06.520 --> 00:07:09.440
… and deepening the background …

00:07:09.440 --> 00:07:13.290
... Manet’s pictures emphasize this flatness by ...

00:07:13.290 --> 00:07:15.590
... reducing depth ...

00:07:16.750 --> 00:07:22.510
... featuring verticals and horizontals which hint at the stretcher behind the canvas ...

00:07:24.860 --> 00:07:29.740
... using sharper relief with stronger contrasts ...

00:07:29.740 --> 00:07:33.510
... leaving certain parts apparently “unfinished”.

00:07:36.510 --> 00:07:42.350
In this way, they tell viewers more plainly what they are to look at:

00:07:42.350 --> 00:07:49.590
they are not allowed to linger over titillating details, while protesting hypocritically that brushwork is the draw.

00:07:49.590 --> 00:07:54.680
The picture becomes more autonomous: it gives only what it wants to give.

00:07:55.410 --> 00:08:01.190
Seen in these terms, Madame Guillemet is not just a queen of fashion, but an allegory of modern painting.

00:08:01.190 --> 00:08:09.220
She excites and attracts us, so much so that we feel like reaching out to touch her -

00:08:09.220 --> 00:08:14.930
….only to be led, with unrelenting firmness, back to the surface of the picture.

00:08:16.030 --> 00:08:20.040
Manet builds his effect on a calculated blend of the artificial and the superficial,

00:08:20.040 --> 00:08:25.770
and these are also the springs of the trap which he - and Madame Guillemet - set for covetous spectators,

00:08:25.770 --> 00:08:30.190
who find themselves simultaneously attracted and repulsed.

00:08:30.190 --> 00:08:34.480
Next ArtSleuth episode: Botticelli's *Birth of Venus* - Do you really know this woman?

00:08:34.480 --> 00:08:40.450
Find more information on: www.canal-educatif.fr

00:08:40.850 --> 00:08:43.850
Written and directed by:

00:08:43.850 --> 00:08:46.810
Produced by:

00:08:46.810 --> 00:08:49.800
Scientific advisor:

00:08:49.800 --> 00:08:53.110
This film exists thanks to the support of donors (possibly you!) and the French Ministry of Culture

00:08:53.110 --> 00:08:55.880
Voiceover:

00:08:55.880 --> 00:08:58.850
Video editing and motion graphics:

00:08:58.850 --> 00:09:01.850
Sound sync & sound recording

00:09:01.850 --> 00:09:04.950
Music selection

00:09:04.950 --> 00:09:07.850
Music

00:09:07.850 --> 00:09:11.210
Special thanks

00:09:11.210 --> 00:09:13.210
A CED production (support us and there will be more ;-))