A Democrat, it was not, it was an evil light. It's little by little,
early 19th that it has changed:
they went to call the Government representative 'democracy ',.
and at the same time it became a positive word.
But these are elected officials who have left to do this... because they saw much interest.
and it was already the newspeak. Because when you call...
In my opinion, the elected representatives feel that...
... the people is aware of itself. When we say "the people."
one feels in; We all, and... by the etymology,.
even without having a great culture policy, by the simple etymology,
the word 'democracy', he was a revolutionary force in him.
And...
... people... aspire people, anywhere in the world
aspire to the kratos demos, we... We want to decide our fate ourselves.
In my opinion... the elect know well.
And elected officials are aware also that the Government representative
It is not democracy.
So they have, elected officials really have an interest...
I'm not sure this is aware.
Because it is possible that this is unconscious, eh. I... not at all...
Whether a conspiracy or not... I don't care completely. It is equal ca.
But... the elect let do: they leave call 'democracy ',.
the regime that gives them their elected all political power.
It suits them well, since it is they who have the power. They are candidates:
one day or another they will have. All male parties are like that.
And thus the word 'democracy', it has been, to have been flying.
Not from the outset, because I tell you, they called it not "democracy" at the beginning.
But very quickly, beginning of the 19th, before even that Tocqueville writes
"Of democracy in America", referring to a plan
that was not a democracy. As early as before...
It was 25-35 the two volumes of...
I believe 25...
I believe 1825-1835 "of democracy in America.
And I believe that already before we had traces of the use of the word 'democracy '.
for the... A Rosanvallon, who wrote a good article on it. He wrote an article in 93
on this transformation of... of a regime that is not democracy in democracy,
trying to understand at what point and why it happened.
Important the work of historian of Rosanvallon.
Rosanvallon is not a revolutionary, ca this is the least that can be said:
in its conclusions and in its proposals, it is...
Me, I find very disappointing ca, because in his work as an historian
to explain how humans resistant to abuse of power...
Pretty darn important what Rosanvallon. Rosanvallon says...
... Since Athens, point by point, what humans are doing to resist
the abuse of power. It's pretty darn interesting. It is a mine,
an ideas mine to resist.
Rosanvallon is interesting. In its conclusions, it is...
... it is not him who will make projects of... an alternative, but...
Because it is too...
How to tell? Conservative? It is not a revolutionary.
But it is a work of historian precious for us.
Therefore the newspeak, Yes, it has been poking a few important words:
the word 'democracy', the word "suffrage", yeah.