Amara

Loading... Select your Languages

English subtitles

← Chernobyl: A Million Casualties

View Subtitles (5)

Showing Revision 1, created 06/20/2011 by Michael Cassady .

  1. Title:
    Chernobyl: A Million Casualties
  2. Description:

    A million people have died so far as a result of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear plant accident, explains Janette Sherman, M.D., toxicologist and contributing editor of the book Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. Published by the New York Academy of Sciences, the book, authored by Dr. Alexey Yablokov, Dr. Vassily Nesterenko and Dr. Alexey Nesterenko, examined medical records now available--which expose as a lie the claim of the International Atomic Energy Commission that perhaps 4,000 people may die as a result of Chernobyl.
    Enviro Close-Up # 610 (29 mintes)

  3. Chernobyl, a million casualties
  4. Next on Enviro Close-up
  5. Welome to Enviro-Close-up
  6. I am Karl Grossman
  7. This coming April 26th
  8. marks the 25th anniversary of
  9. the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster
  10. Meanwhile, the nuclear industry worldwide
  11. is pushing for a revival of nuclear power
  12. and this very important book has been published
  13. Title: "Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe..
  14. for People and the Environment"
  15. and, it concludes, based on now available medical data
  16. that, between 1986, the year of the accident,
  17. and 2004, 985,00 people died as the result
  18. of the disaster
  19. and more have been dying since.
  20. With us is Dr. Janet Sherman
  21. she's the contributing editor of this book
  22. which was authored by a noted Russian biologist
  23. Alexey Yablokov
  24. Vassily Nesterenko
  25. and Alexey Nesterenko,
  26. they're both from Belorussia
  27. Welcome Janet.
  28. How did these people die?
  29. I mean we're talking a million people dead
  30. from this nuclear accident. How?
  31. They died of multiple different kinds of diseases
  32. from cancer to heart disease, brain damage,
  33. thyroid cancer.
  34. But many children died in utero
  35. in other words before they were born
  36. or died of birth defects after they were born
  37. How did these scientists determine
  38. 985,000 deaths as the result of Chernobyl?
  39. Based on medical data that were
  40. available to the scientists.
  41. Now what we've heard, frankly since the accident
  42. from the International Atomic Energy Agency
  43. which is the global group
  44. which is supposed to regulate
  45. and promote nuclear power
  46. the casualties of Chernobyl
  47. well currently, from IAEA, on its website
  48. says maybe, in all, there were 4,000 people dead.
  49. Now that's quite different from 985,000
  50. Why this discrepancy?
  51. Well, they released a report
  52. called the "Chernobyl Forum",
  53. and they only included about 350 articles
  54. available in the English language.
  55. But, Dr. Yablokov, and the two Nesterenkos
  56. looked at well over 5,000 articles
  57. and the people who were, excuse the term
  58. "boots on the ground"
  59. people who were there, who saw what was going on
  60. We're talking about medical doctors
  61. scientists, veterinarians, epidemiologist
  62. who saw what was happening
  63. when people in their communities
  64. were getting sick and dying.
  65. There's another international agency,
  66. the World Health Organization (WHO)
  67. and indeed the book charges
  68. the truth has not come out on Chernobyl
  69. from the WHO,
  70. and forget about the IAEA
  71. because of an agreement between these two agencies
  72. Can you elaborate on that agreement?
  73. They formed an agreement in 1959
  74. that has not been changed
  75. where one will not release a report
  76. without the agreement of the other.
  77. Now, this is like having Dracula guarding the blood-bank
  78. because the WHO who is charged with
  79. "world health organization"
  80. is beholden to the IAEA
  81. before they can release a report.
  82. And, what the IAEA, I mentioned before,
  83. is there to regulate nuclear technology
  84. around the world
  85. But, it is also set up to promote it.
  86. And, it evidently does not want anything from WHO
  87. which would indicate that nuclear power
  88. is not good for one's health.
  89. That's right, and this needs to be ended,
  90. this agreement needs to be stopped.
  91. Let me go right to you
  92. You've devoted your life to the impacts of poison
  93. That's been your specialty, a toxicologist.
  94. Here, your editing this book
  95. you're going through all this scientific data
  96. This has to be— a million dead of the Chernobyl accident —
  97. the biggest technological disaster,
  98. frankly, in the history of the world!
  99. True.
  100. How did you feel as you looked at the data
  101. and you put this book together?
  102. Well, I realized it was far worse than I thought it was
  103. and that, not only were, people dying of cancer
  104. and heart disease,
  105. but every single organ in the body,
  106. whether it was immunological, or lungs,
  107. or cataracts, or skin:
  108. Everything was adversely affected.
  109. But, not only people,
  110. every single system that was studied
  111. and not all were, but every system that was studied
  112. whether it was humans, or fish, or tress,
  113. or birds, bacteria, viruses, wolves, cows,
  114. Every system was changed,
  115. every single system, without exception.
  116. And, this was reflected in the book?
  117. It's not just human effects.
  118. Many of the birds and animals
  119. had similar adverse effects as humans
  120. Most people aren't familiar... We all know I think,
  121. at this point that radio-activity and cancer
  122. go together
  123. But heart problems, heart disease,
  124. how does that connect?
  125. Well, one of the most fascinating things
  126. that I learned when I was rewriting the text
  127. of the book, and going through all of the data,
  128. was one of the scientists, Bandeshevski (sic)
  129. had done a study that showed that the Cesium 137 levels
  130. in children were the same as he had found in test animals
  131. and were causing heart damage.
  132. He reported this,
  133. and for his work, he was put in prison
  134. He was put in prison?
  135. He was put in prison, yes.
  136. And, he analyzed... these are animals, that were...
  137. Well he did the original study on animals,
  138. and, then, as a pathologist, studying the results
  139. in children, and he found the same changes
  140. in the hearts of children, who had died,
  141. as he had seen in the animals.
  142. And, when he reported it
  143. his thanks was, he was arrested and put in prison.
  144. The radio activity from Chernobyl
  145. Russia, Belorussia, the Ukraine:
  146. these were three places where
  147. a lot of the radiation was deposited.
  148. But, according to this book,
  149. again based on data,
  150. those poisons came down all over the world.
  151. Yes, they did. And, the greatest concentrations
  152. came down in Belorussia, the Ukraine and Russia,
  153. but the greatest amount, more that 50 percent
  154. spread around the entire northern hemisphere.
  155. Particularly north into Scandinavia,
  156. and eastward into Asia.
  157. As far as China.
  158. Oh, yes.
  159. The book concludes, indeed,
  160. that the deaths, as a result of Chernobyl,
  161. occurred not just in Belorussia, Russia and the Ukraine,
  162. but all over.
  163. Oh, around the entire world, yes of course.
  164. How long will this continue?
  165. I mean, some of the poisons that were discharged
  166. they're going to be around for millennia?
  167. Oh yes, I mean just the two main ones
  168. Cesium 137 and Strontium 90
  169. have half-lives of about 30 years
  170. so they'll be around for three centuries at least,
  171. but many of the isotopes will be
  172. around for millennia, you're right.
  173. The book, however, stresses that
  174. the worst damage occurred in those early months
  175. particularly those early weeks,
  176. when the fire— there was this huge fire
  177. that they weren't able to put out.— that was blazing.
  178. Well yes, but still right now
  179. the reactor is leaking into the water supply,
  180. the structure that is around the reactor right now
  181. is not sound.
  182. And, if there is as much as a mild earth-quake
  183. there's a chance of it collapsing.
  184. So, this reactor is by no means covered up
  185. or safe, and not leaking.
  186. This book, telling the truth about Chernobyl
  187. was published by the New York Academy of Sciences
  188. a rather prestigious organization.
  189. What about the rest of the scientific establishment?
  190. What's been there, how can I put it,
  191. stance, their position, in getting this
  192. information out about Chernobyl?
  193. Well, some groups have been very
  194. interested in getting out the information.
  195. And, people allied with the nuclear industry
  196. would just as soon nobody knew anything about
  197. what's in that books.
  198. How did Dr. Yoblekov, and the Dr.s Nosterenko
  199. embark on this journey with you
  200. of looking into the impacts of Chernobyl?
  201. Well, they have been aware of
  202. the WHO and IAEA agreement, and actually
  203. there have been people 24/7 outside
  204. the WHO Geneva (Switzerland) headquarters
  205. trying to get this stopped, this agreement stopped.
  206. Have these people been demonstrating?
  207. Demonstrating, yes.
  208. Picketing because of this...
  209. (This agreement...)
  210. what the book describes as a collusive
  211. agreement between the IAEA and WhO.
  212. That's correct. Alexey Yoblokov was
  213. a consultant to both Gorbachev and Yelstin,
  214. on the Chernobyl issues,
  215. and, as you know, the data were covered up
  216. for about three years after Chernobyl happened,
  217. because the governments did not want
  218. anything to be known by people
  219. and they collected almost nothing
  220. in the way of data.
  221. Alexey became interested in that
  222. and started collecting information.
  223. I think there is something like 150,000 publications
  224. that have come out, and they utilized
  225. well over 5,000 in writing this books.
  226. Many of the sources in here have never been
  227. translated in English.
  228. Mostly were in the languages of
  229. Ukraine, Russia and Belorussia.
  230. So, this is entirely new informaiton
  231. that has not been available to the Western world,
  232. You talk about the impacts on people
  233. on animals, on plant life.
  234. Are the mechanisms different?
  235. No, essentially, the mechanisms are the same.
  236. Exposure to these radio-active isotopes
  237. are taken up by plants, birds, taken up by humans
  238. and damage the cells, kill some of the cells,
  239. damage the DNA, damage the genetic
  240. mechanisms of species.
  241. Now, if it kills the cell, then it's not
  242. going to go on to cause cancer,
  243. if it damages a cell, it can go on
  244. to cause cancer, or a birth defect,
  245. in a human, a bird, or even "birth defects" in plants.
  246. Plants have been altered by Chernobyl.
  247. Now, you just mentioned how the consequences
  248. were a lot toward the northwest,
  249. because the winds were blowing
  250. towards of all places Scandinavia, the Lapps,
  251. I mean people who had nothing to do
  252. with Chernobyl or nuclear power.
  253. They got hit.
  254. There was rain, there was fallout, and so forth.
  255. Speak about those consequences.
  256. A recent study has come out
  257. showing that children born in Scandinavia,
  258. at the time when the Chernobyl fallout occurred,
  259. are less likely to graduate from high-school.
  260. They have intellectual impairment.
  261. Probably the most serious consequence of Chernobyl
  262. that I'm aware of is that only 20% of children
  263. in Belorussia are considered healthy.
  264. That means 80% of the children in Belorussia
  265. are not well, compared to the data that they have
  266. of children before the Chernobyl accident,
  267. and they're medically not well,
  268. and they are intellectually below par.
  269. How would that... what would be the relationship there?
  270. Between radio-activity and a deterioration
  271. of intellectual capability?
  272. Well, while a mother is pregnant,
  273. she is eating food, and what happened, was
  274. most of the people did not know, or they did
  275. not have access to food that was not contaminated.
  276. These isotopes are taken into the body while
  277. a woman is pregnant.
  278. They are transported through her body
  279. to the unborn, and damage the heart, the lungs,
  280. the thyroids, the brains,
  281. all the tissues, the immunological system
  282. of these unborn.
  283. These children are born unwell, low birth weight.
  284. There was a very high fetal death rate
  285. as a result of these exposures.
  286. This is probably the greatest tragedy
  287. that could occur to a culture
  288. After the accident, from the Ukraine,
  289. which had been the break-basket of the
  290. former Soviet-Union, where Chernobyl was and is.
  291. In fact there's three units of the Chernobyl
  292. nuclear facility still in operation.
  293. In any case, that food moved around.
  294. Well, this is an extremely serious problem.
  295. How do you get enough food for people
  296. if the land is contaminated for three centuries?
  297. And, not only are you worried about grains,
  298. like wheat, or rye, but you also have to worry
  299. about mushrooms. It doesn't sound
  300. very important, but mushrooms are
  301. a very big part of the food supply in that area.
  302. And, these are extremely contaminated.
  303. The book concludes,
  304. based on 985,000 people dead,
  305. the data, however, just covers
  306. from 1986 to 2004.
  307. As we opened the program by mentioning
  308. a million casualties, would that be essentially
  309. the number that became victims of Chernobyl?
  310. I believe that's correct, that we will see that many.
  311. We know, for instance, that people called
  312. the liquidators.
  313. These were the young men and women
  314. who were recruited, largely from the military,
  315. from countries all around the area
  316. to go in to put out the fires,
  317. and contain the Chernobyl mess.
  318. 15% of them have died.
  319. And, now these were young men and women,
  320. we're talking about between 18 and 30.
  321. Dr. Sherman, in terms of the amount
  322. of radio-activity emitted from the plant,
  323. there to is a big discrepancy between
  324. what's revealed in this book
  325. and what's been acknowledged up to now.
  326. Absolutely, and if a small amount was emitted,
  327. the we have to conclude that low levels
  328. of radiation are extremely damaging.
  329. And, if large levels were emitted, we have to
  330. understand how much damage has been done.
  331. But, we really don't know yet
  332. because nobody has been able to find out
  333. what is actually left in the reactor,
  334. that is leaking into the ground-water.
  335. What does this say about the safety
  336. of nuclear power?
  337. I mean, the nuclear industry, the nuclear
  338. establishment, because a lot of the nuclear
  339. industry involved government entities,
  340. a push is on to revive nuclear power, to create
  341. a nuclear Renaissance, to build many, many
  342. more nuclear power plants.
  343. What's the lesson of Chernobyl?
  344. I think the lesson of Chernobyl is
  345. we should be very careful before
  346. we push technology. I mean we were told
  347. that there was no problem with British Petroleum
  348. drilling in the Gulf of Mexico,
  349. There's one issue of technology,
  350. where engineers do certain things, but they
  351. don't understand the biology.
  352. They don't understand what's happening
  353. to life around these installations.
  354. And, I think Chernobyl is the biggest lesson
  355. of what is happened to all species
  356. that were contaminated. No exceptions.
  357. I mean, the book talks about Owls...
  358. could you elaborate upon some of the effects on animals?
  359. One of the scientists, whose photograph
  360. is on the book, is Tim Rousseau,
  361. form the University of South Carolina.
  362. He's led about 25 groups of scientists to
  363. the Chernobyl area
  364. and the have studied insects, and birds, and animals,
  365. and owls, and all kinds of different animals
  366. as tot what's going on.
  367. He said one of the trips he made,
  368. he suddenly realized there were no bees,
  369. and there was no fruit falling on the ground.
  370. And, he realized there was no fruit
  371. falling on the ground, because
  372. there were no bees that had pollenated the trees.
  373. So, he is predicting, and this may
  374. indeed happen, that there could be
  375. a complete loss of species around Chernobly
  376. as a result of these isotopes that are still decaying,
  377. that could wipe out entire species.
  378. I mean, you know, after all, it is a major
  379. bird transport area, migration area,
  380. and we don't know what's happening
  381. when the birds come through,
  382. eating whatever they can find on the ground
  383. and then flying on, dropping the berries
  384. further on after they have left the Chernobyl area.
  385. The genetic impacts.
  386. I mean rado-activity has an enormous
  387. effect on genes. Speak on that.
  388. These are unlikely to be improved.
  389. Once you get a genetic defect,
  390. it becomes transmitted
  391. generation after generation after generation
  392. so these defects, occurring in humans, in birds
  393. in plants, are unlikely to improve the species
  394. as they occur.
  395. What kinds of genetic defects
  396. are you speaking of?
  397. Well, in humans, were talking about
  398. brain defects, heart defects, limb defects,
  399. children without arms,
  400. hydrocephalic babies.
  401. In birds, we're looking at changes
  402. in the feathers, and in the beaks, and in
  403. their brain size.
  404. Talk about 'bird brains', these birds
  405. are not as smart.
  406. And they're not going to be able to function
  407. as well as the birds that are not changed.
  408. We know that the plants have been changed,
  409. irreversably.
  410. You know, this is not rocket science:
  411. we know where these isotopes go,
  412. we know that Iodine goes to the thyroid.
  413. We know that Strontium 90 goes
  414. to bones and teeth— particularly to the unborn.
  415. We know that Cesium 137 goes to
  416. the heart and to the muscles.
  417. This is not a mystery,
  418. and, if we know this, we can predict
  419. what the adverse effects are going to be.
  420. And, indeed, they turned out to be just that,
  421. and its shown, proven, in this book.
  422. This has to constitute one of the...well, the claim
  423. that just a few thousand people died
  424. as a result of Chernobyl disaster:
  425. One of the biggest lies in history, no?
  426. Absolutely, and they've been able
  427. get away with it.
  428. We need to put pressure on the WHO,
  429. and the United Nations,
  430. to separate the WHO from the IAEA.
  431. Not just on the international level
  432. with the International Atomic Energy Agency
  433. and the World Health Organization,
  434. here in the United States,
  435. the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has too
  436. tried to minimize the impacts of radio-activity.
  437. You're absolutely correct, and I can
  438. go back to the Atomic Energy Commission,
  439. before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  440. I worked for for the AEC, at the University
  441. of California, in 1952.
  442. That was my first job out of college.
  443. And, if I could figure out
  444. with my limited experience at that time
  445. and my limited education at that time
  446. that radiation was harmful,
  447. then other people could figure it out.
  448. We have had secrecy and lies
  449. to the American public, for decades,
  450. about the effects of nuclear radiation.
  451. There have been cover-ups,
  452. these has been falsification of data,
  453. There have been people who have said
  454. don't worry about a little Strontium 90,
  455. don't worry about deuterium
  456. coming out of the plant,
  457. We know that Davis Bessie (sic)
  458. almost melted, within an inch of its
  459. containment, as a result of its poor maintenance.
  460. And, I believe it's just a matter of time
  461. before we have another nuclear problem
  462. somewhere in the world
  463. if not in the United States.
  464. Well, why. You were within the nuclear establishment
  465. way back. We're talking about a half century ago.
  466. Does it have to do with money?
  467. Does it have to do with promoting
  468. a technology that these people
  469. are connected with— the nuclear scientists.
  470. Why the lying, why the deception?
  471. I think it has to do with many things, I think it's
  472. the money. And the control is on
  473. corporations who are promoting
  474. nuclear technology.
  475. But, we also have enormous
  476. scientific ignorance in this country,
  477. people who really don't understand biology.
  478. I think if I lined up 20 people
  479. let's say in a mall someplace, and said,
  480. "Put your hand over your liver."
  481. I'll bet you half of them couldn't do it.
  482. And, to explain to people what's happening
  483. with nuclear radiation. I think our
  484. educational system is so poor these days
  485. that children are not learning
  486. about biology, and physics and chemistry,
  487. and its essential because it such a major
  488. part of our culture and our economy.
  489. As you plowed through all this data,
  490. the consequences of Chernobyl,
  491. did the experience back decades ago
  492. connect in any way with what you were doing?
  493. Absolutely, I mean this has been know for decades
  494. the adverse effects of radio-activity.
  495. This is not something that has just occurred
  496. in the last couple of years.
  497. I mean scientists who have any knowledge
  498. whatsoever of physics, can figure out
  499. where an isotope is going to go
  500. in a body, or in a plant, or in a bird.
  501. I mean, this is not mysterious kinds of science.
  502. What does Chernobyl represent.
  503. I mean we're talking about a million dead.
  504. What does it represent in terms of
  505. technological history, or the current
  506. technological scene.
  507. What does it mean?
  508. I think it represents very strongly that
  509. we cannot depend on technology,
  510. nor can we depend on humans
  511. who operate and design this technology,
  512. because the ultimate failure is human failure,
  513. as it happened at Chernobyl.
  514. We're talking here about
  515. health consequences on
  516. the most massive of scales.
  517. Yes, indeed, around the entire
  518. northern hemisphere.
  519. Wherever the fallout was
  520. people ended up dead.
  521. They would up dead, and they wound up
  522. children who were grossly impaired
  523. intellectually and mecically, and this
  524. is going on. It hasn't stopped yet,
  525. it's still going on.
  526. Dr. Sherman, how can people get
  527. a copy of this book?
  528. They could contact me by e-mail.
  529. I am toxdoc.js@verizon.net.
  530. And, I hope to have information on how
  531. they can get copies of this book.
  532. Yes, I think it's very important, at this time,
  533. that people learn the truth
  534. about what happened as a result of
  535. the Chernobyl disaster.
  536. Thank you so much for doing this work Dr. Sherman.
  537. This has been Enviro-Close-up.
  538. I am Karl Grossman.
  539. Thank you for watching, and to get
  540. a copy of this, or any Enviro video program
  541. just visit our website
  542. at www.envirovideo.com.
  543. This program was taped on March 5th 2011
  544. six days before the nuclear disaster in japan
  545. began unfolding.
  546. The clear lesson of Chernobyl, and now
  547. the Japanese disaster: all nuclear plants
  548. should be shut down.
  549. They present a clear and present danger
  550. to life on Earth.
  551. No more nuclear plants should be built.
  552. Tax-payer subsides for nuclear power
  553. must be stopped, and we must embark
  554. immediately on an energy program of
  555. efficiency, and full implementation of
  556. solar, wind, geo-thermal, and other
  557. safe, clean energy technologies
  558. which are here today,
  559. and render deadly nuclear power
  560. completely unnecessary.